On 8/8/06, Jon Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 20:47 +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> I read today more on blending options in PS
> (http://www.samspublishing.com/articles/printerfriendly.asp?p=26131&rl=1)
> and I wonder If we want something similar in OpenRaster.
>
I think this sounds like a natural thing to include in this format for
operating on images. I'm sure as well we will find a great way to
unearth even more blending modes, etc.
In my current experiments in GEGL (which has serialization/parsing of
XCF2 like XML now), I have not set any restriction on what
filters/composers (compositing modes) can be used. I probably already
use more such modes than photoshop support.
The bigger question is which compositing modes should be in a baseline
specification for OpenRaster, the classic over operator is the only
one that is 100% mandatory.
/Øyvind K.
--
«The future is already here. It's just not very evenly distributed»
-- William Gibson
http://pippin.gimp.org/ http://ffii.org/
_______________________________________________
CREATE mailing list
CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create
