* Jon Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060821 10:22]: >> ... > This all looks pretty interesting...where else is this spec'd out? > Krita-devs, what are you guys thinking? Pippin, it would be great to get > some more core gimp developers on here to discuss this as well...
This isn't spec'ed further out, except perhaps a few more examples done with pen in a notebook. and thus is not implemented yet. But it can be seen as an evolution of oxide[1], xcf2[2] or the current XML processing tree format in GEGL CVS [3]. > What does OpenDocument use for the root element? I wonder how we can > best integrate with ODF? This is only the core XML representation of a tree of layers. Further specing would also entail things like deciding if groups of layers even should be allowed in a baseline, what set of operations needs to be available etc. For now I might even just continue using <gegl> as the root level element. /Øyvind K. 1: http://pippin.gimp.org/oxide/ 2: http://pippin.gimp.org/xcf2/ 3: http://pippin.gimp.org/gegl/ -- «The future is already here. It's just not very evenly distributed» -- William Gibson http://pippin.gimp.org/ http://ffii.org/ _______________________________________________ CREATE mailing list CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create
