Hi Øyvind, El día 25 de marzo de 2012 16:17, Øyvind Kolås <pip...@gimp.org> escribió: > 2012/3/25 Manuel Quiñones <ma...@laptop.org>: >>> Personally I don't really think of OpenRaster as an animation format, >>> but if it can be made to work as one in a way that's compatible with >>> static image editors (ideally in a way that doesn't break when edited by >>> a static image editor (good luck[1]!)), why not? I think in order to >>> keep the formal, baseline part of the spec nice and light, animation >>> would have to be an extension - though possibly a very standard >>> extension if it's well specified, would work with more than one app, and >>> seems sound to a consensus of animators. > > Before OpenRaster was even thought of I was working on a format for a > video editor that included animation, this format served as the > inspiration for the XML I used in GEGL which in turn provided one of > the bases of experience that OpenRaster is built on. The original > format I refer to I called oxide and it is documented here > http://codecave.org/oxide/ not sure if it really has that much to do > with OpenRaster but it can serve as inspiration for something else. > Note that the interpolation methods for the time/value keyframed > property animation was also possible to specify.
Hey thanks for pointing me to oxide, I remember taking a look at it a while ago. I can take some inspiration from it. > /Ø > _______________________________________________ > CREATE mailing list > CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create -- .. manuq .. _______________________________________________ CREATE mailing list CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create
