Hi, Louis that is correct.
br gnokii 2014/1/21 Louis Desjardins <louis.desjard...@gmail.com> > 2014/1/20 S.Kemter <sirko.kem...@gmail.com> > >> Hi, >> >> Nope it hasnt, some here on the list wanted to discuss an CoC >> furthermore, some even wanted to take a vote on it. I feel since days >> ignored because the discussion went on. The only one who can have a problem >> with it, is from my point of view is Louis, because he has to take it to >> PSF an look if they can agree to that solution. >> > > Hi Sirko, > > I would like to follow up on your suggestion about the CoC and its variant > being the measures already in place at the university of Leipzig. > > I believe we can expose the situation clearly to the PSF board and let > them know about the situation. > > I apologize for the misundersanting. I missed your point at first but now, > reading this over and with this email, I understand and fully agree. > So, correct me if I am wrong, what I understand is we could plead the fact > that for this year’s LGM we’re going to go by the rules of the university > of Leipzig, which is our host. So, we’ll ask PSF if being at a German > university, with its strong social equity laws, and the constant > in-person presence of the University's "Gleichstellungsbeauftragten" > staff, will meet their requirements for a CoC in order to get their > funding. > > I am completely comfortable with that and I think it is a fair solution. > Especially considering the fact that the CoC we would vote and even if we > picked one that already exists is too short on deadline for it to be > reviewed by the administrators at the University, also considering that for > them there would be no point since they already have strong rules and we > must — as LGM organizers — comply with the rules of our host. > > On top of that, we can explain PSF people that the LGM community is going > to gather at the LGM to discuss that subject and reach a decision for the > years to come. Basically, from the stand point of PSF, we have 2014 covered > and we’re preparing 2015 and further. > > I put reasonable faith in the process and its positive outcome. I trust > that people at PSF will lend us a comprehensive ear. Of course, the > decision is theirs. > > I hope I got things right and if anything don’t hesitate to correct me! > > Cheers! > > Louis > > >> >> Of course after I spoke with him and we find a way he will get his own >> page on lgm.org but before I speak with him, I think Louis should look >> that PSF agrees for that I waited. >> >> >> br gnokii >> >> >> 2014/1/21 Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com> >> >>> Dear Sirko, >>> >>> On 20 January 2014 23:46, Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > On 20 January 2014 15:11, Louis Desjardins <louis.desjard...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Would it be ok if we make the decision with the co-organisers of this >>> year’s >>> >> LGM plus the people here who followed the discussion (in silent or >>> not)? >>> > >>> > But clearly its the co-organizers' prerogative to figure out who >>> > incidents should be escalated to, or not, to put a CoC on the website, >>> > or not, and if they provide physical items to attendees >>> > (schedules/name badges/promo bags/etc) to include a copy, or not. >>> > >>> > If the bureaucracy of the host means its not possible for the >>> > co-organizers, that's okay for me, and next year I hope there will be >>> > one. >>> >>> I just realised that its been around a week since your email, and you >>> didn't yet follow up with some news on what you wrote: >>> >>> On 15 January 2014 17:04, S.Kemter <sirko.kem...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > we will not have an ok [on a CoC text] before LGM. >>> >>> I think its worth re-iterating this point; there will not be a CoC at >>> this LGM, not because the organizers don't want one, but because >>> putting one in place would require more time than is available. >>> >>> > What we could do is simple to invite the "Gleichstellungsbeauftragten" >>> I >>> > dont know how to translate that titel and if Equality Ombudsman is >>> right for >>> > it to watch over us and we can surly ask him to help us for >>> formulating an >>> > CoC for later events. I think nobody of us would be that firm as >>> someone, >>> > who does nothing else then handle exactly what some here think an CoC >>> would >>> > solve. >>> >>> Sirko, how has the invitation to the Gleichstellungsbeauftragten fared? >>> >>> If they agree to attend, will their presence and how to reach them be >>> mentioned on the website, and will attendees be notified at the event? >>> >>> -- >>> Cheers >>> Dave >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> make me rich, buy my Inkscape book http://is.gd/yq5OD0 ;) >> > > -- make me rich, buy my Inkscape book http://is.gd/yq5OD0 ;)
_______________________________________________ CREATE mailing list CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create