The FRBRoo models mass production, surely. However, the scope note of F3_Manifestation_Product_Type clearly states that the scope of this sub class of E55 Type is limited to the production of something carrying information. The scope of F3_Manifestation_Product_Type comprises books, prints, videos, and all kind of items carrying information (usually found in libraries).
Surely a coin carries information and coins are usually mass produced (today automatically) earlier by hand (by hammer and stamp(s)). When coins are seen as information carriers with information carried by them, they can be or should model in FRBRoo. If one is not interested in this aspect then model in Maria's presentation is fine. It describes the coin as a produced artefact. C-E >-----Original Message----- >From: Crm-sig [mailto:crm-sig-boun...@ics.forth.gr] On Behalf Of Dan Matei >Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 2:03 PM >To: crm-sig@ics.forth.gr >Subject: [Crm-sig] Coins 2 CRM (again) > >Dear Maria > > > >Thanks you. I've read your (very useful) London presentation: > > > >http://www.slideshare.net/MariaTheodoridou/london-meetup2014- >mappingchi2cidoccrm ><http://www.slideshare.net/MariaTheodoridou/london-meetup2014- >mappingchi2cidoccrm> > > > >and I plan to take advantage of the mapping: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl/3M ><http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl/3M> > > > >But I'm tempted to treat the coins as exemplars of an "issue", i.e. > > > ><F5_Item> <crm:R7_is_example_of> <crm:F3_Manifestation_Product_Type> > > > >IMHO, a thing like: > > > >http://numismatics.org/ocre/id/ric.1(2).cl.31 > > > >is a F3, mutatis mutandis. > > > >When you did your mapping did you considered something like this ? And >which were the arguments against ? > > > >Best, > > > >Dan >
