Dear all,
In the light of Christian Emils example I would propose for discussion:

Geopolitical units exist in time and may vary in spatial extent and can be 
modeled as instances of E4 Period.
A geopolitical unit as a specific case of an E4 Period is the set of activities 
and phenomena related to the claim of power, the consequences of belonging to a 
jurisdictional
area and an administrative system that establishe a geopolitical unit. Examples 
are countries, administrative areas of countries as districts whose actions and 
structures
define activities and phenomena in the area that they intend to govern. The 
borders of geopolitical units are often defined in contracts or treaties and 
can be seen as declarative places as defined in CRMgeo. The phenomenal borders 
(both spatial and temporal) of a geopolitical unit can be different to the 
declarative borders, in particular at times of war.
The spatiotemporal properties of Geopolitical units can be modelled through the 
properties inherited from E92 Spacetime volume.

Best,
Gerald

From: Crm-sig 
<crm-sig-boun...@ics.forth.gr<mailto:crm-sig-boun...@ics.forth.gr>> on behalf 
of Christian-Emil Smith Ore <c.e.s....@iln.uio.no<mailto:c.e.s....@iln.uio.no>>
Date: Wednesday 29 March 2017 at 07:11
To: Chryssoula Bekiari <beki...@ics.forth.gr<mailto:beki...@ics.forth.gr>>, 
crm-sig <crm-sig@ics.forth.gr<mailto:crm-sig@ics.forth.gr>>
Subject: [Crm-sig] issue 312 hw


Dear all

In issue 312 I was asked to formulate an example to be used in the definition 
of E4 Period:

Subclass of:          
E2<file:///C:/data/cidoc-crm/2016/Berlin%20desember/CIDOC%20CRM%206.2.2(current%20since%202-12-2016)(site).docx#_E2_Temporal_Entity>
 Temporal Entity

Subclass of           
E92<file:///C:/data/cidoc-crm/2016/Berlin%20desember/CIDOC%20CRM%206.2.2(current%20since%202-12-2016)(site).docx#_E91_Co-Reference_Assignment>
 Spacetime volume



Geopolitical units exist in time and may vary in spatial extent and can be 
modeled as instances of E4 Period.



 I was asked to formulate a Scandinavian example.  First some background for 
those of you not very familiar with Nordic history:



In 1397 the Kalmar Union consisting of Denmark, Norway and Sweden, was 
established. Sweden finally broke out in 1522. Norway became a de facto part of 
Denmark from the Lutheran reformation in 1537 until the Kiel Peace Treaty 
between Denmark and Sweden was signed in 1814. The original intention of the 
treaty was to give Sweden the area of Norway. For some unknown reasons the 
Swedish crown prince and former French general Jean-Bapstiste Bernadotte 
intervened and insisted that Norway should be considered to be a separate 
kingdom in a personal union (under him) with Sweden. The reason is unclear but 
it may have been a way to secure his position in case the Swedes rejected him 
(Norway was larger than the tiny Principality of Pontecorv o given him by 
Napoleon). Somewhat surprisingly, the very liberal Norwegian constitution 
stemming from the short period of Norwegian independence in 1814 was accepted 
by Bernadotte. (It is speculated that this was done as a PR-action to appear 
more liberal and thus increase his odds to become the king of France, after an 
advice from Madame de Staël ). In any case, Norway and Sweden was in a so 
called personal union under one king, and a single administration of foreign 
policy (by the King/Swedish government)



The example:

The union of Norway and Sweden under a common king from 1814 to 1905



Best

Christian-Emil​





________________________________
From: Chryssoula Bekiari <beki...@ics.forth.gr<mailto:beki...@ics.forth.gr>>
Sent: 16 January 2017 13:32
To: Christian-Emil Smith Ore
Cc: George Bruseker
Subject: Fwd: HW reminder: issue 312


Dear Christian Emil

I would like to remind you the homework about examples of Period as 
geopolitical unit from Norway/Sweden

best wishes

Chryssoula


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject:        HW reminder: issue 312
Date:   Mon, 16 Jan 2017 14:24:15 +0200
From:   Chryssoula Bekiari <beki...@ics.forth.gr><mailto:beki...@ics.forth.gr>
To:     Gerald Hiebel 
<gerald.hie...@uibk.ac.at><mailto:gerald.hie...@uibk.ac.at>, Dominic Oldman 
<dold...@britishmuseum.org><mailto:dold...@britishmuseum.org>, Wolfgang 
Schmidle <wolfgang.schmi...@uni-koeln.de><mailto:wolfgang.schmi...@uni-koeln.de>
CC:     George Bruseker <bruse...@ics.forth.gr><mailto:bruse...@ics.forth.gr>



Dear All

I would like to remind you the homework

@ Gerald and Wolfgang:  about revision of  the scope note of E4 the
period considering that a E4 Period maybe a geopolitical unit:  a real
phenomenon, claim of power / jurisdictional area .

@Dominic:  provide examples about modern and ancient periods.

all the best

Chryssoula




--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chryssoula Bekiari
Research and Development Engineer

Center for Cultural Informatics / Information Systems Laboratory
Institute of Computer Science
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)

N. Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton, GR-700 13 Heraklion, Crete, Greece
Phone: +30 2810 391631, Fax: +30 2810 391638, Skype: xrysmp
E-mail: beki...@ics.forth.gr<mailto:beki...@ics.forth.gr>
Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl/index_main.php?l=e&c=231
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Reply via email to