During discussions of Nomen Reference Source Attribute it came to light that
the P70 documents examples and scope note do not highlight that any
proposition about reality in any document can be represented by this path.
Issue: Enhance Scope Note to make this clearer and give further examples.
P70 documents (is documented in)
Domain: E31 <> Document
Range: E1 <> CRM Entity
Subproperty of: E89 <> Propositional Object. P67 <> refers
to (is referred to by): E1 <> CRM Entity
Quantification: many to many, necessary (1,n:0,n)
Scope note: This property describes the CRM Entities documented by
instances of E31 Document.
Documents may describe any conceivable entity, hence the link to the
highest-level entity in the CRM hierarchy. This property is intended for
cases where a reference is regarded as being of a documentary character, in
the scholarly or scientific sense.
Examples:
* the British Museum catalogue (E31) documents the British Museum’s
Collection (E78)
In First Order Logic:
P70 (x,y) ⊃ E31(x)
P70 (x,y) ⊃ E1(y)
P70(x,y) ⊃ P67(x,y)
Stephen Stead
Director
Paveprime Ltd
35 Downs Court Rd
Purley, Surrey
UK, CR8 1BF
Tel +44 20 8668 3075
Fax +44 20 8763 1739
Mob +44 7802 755 013
E-mail <mailto:ste...@paveprime.com> ste...@paveprime.com
LinkedIn Profile <https://www.linkedin.com/in/steads/>
https://www.linkedin.com/in/steads/
