+1 -- in Linked Art we have already adopted this approach :) (I think we already discussed in the SIG?)
R On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 12:31 PM Martin Doerr <mar...@ics.forth.gr> wrote: > Dear All, > > I believe that E36 Visual Item should include the surface of statues. > Therefore, > I propose to change the scope note to: > > *NEW:* > This class comprises the intellectual or conceptual aspects of > recognisable marks*, images and other visual works.* > > This class does not intend to describe the idiosyncratic characteristics > of an individual physical embodiment of a visual item, but the underlying > prototype. For example, a mark such as the ICOM logo is generally > considered to be the same logo when used on any number of publications. The > size, orientation and colour may change, but the logo remains uniquely > identifiable. The same is true of images that are reproduced many times. > This means that visual items are independent of their physical support. > > The class E36 Visual Item provides a means of identifying and linking > together instances of E24 Physical Human-Made Thing that carry the same > visual symbols, marks or images etc. The property *P62 depicts (is > depicted by)* between E24 Physical Human-Made Thing and depicted subjects > (E1 CRM Entity) is a shortcut of the more fully developed path from E24 > Physical Human-Made Thing through *P65 shows visual item (is shown by)*, > E36 Visual Item, *P138 represents (has representation)* to E1CRM Entity, > which in addition captures the optical features of the depiction. > > ----- > > And add the example: > > "The surface shape of Auguste Rodin's statue "Le Penseur" [there exist > more than 20 copies, even of different size] > > > *OLD: * > > This class comprises the intellectual or conceptual aspects of > recognisable marks, and visual images. > > This class does not intend to describe the idiosyncratic characteristics > of an individual physical embodiment of a visual item, but the underlying > prototype. For example, a mark such as the ICOM logo is generally > considered to be the same logo when used on any number of publications. The > size, orientation and colour may change, but the logo remains uniquely > identifiable. The same is true of images that are reproduced many times. > This means that visual items are independent of their physical support. > > > > The class E36 Visual Item provides a means of identifying and linking > together instances of E24 Physical Human-Made Thing that carry the same > visual symbols, marks or images etc. The property *P62 depicts (is > depicted by)* between E24 Physical Human-Made Thing and depicted subjects > (E1 CRM Entity) is a shortcut of the more fully developed path from E24 > Physical Human-Made Thing through *P65 shows visual item (is shown by)*, > E36 Visual Item, *P138 represents (has representation)* to E1CRM Entity, > which in addition captures the optical features of the depiction. > > -- > ------------------------------------ > Dr. Martin Doerr > > Honorary Head of the > Center for Cultural Informatics > > Information Systems Laboratory > Institute of Computer Science > Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH) > > N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton, > GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece > > Vox:+30(2810)391625 > Email: mar...@ics.forth.gr > Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl > > _______________________________________________ > Crm-sig mailing list > Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr > http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig > -- Rob Sanderson Director for Cultural Heritage Metadata Yale University
_______________________________________________ Crm-sig mailing list Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
