Dear All,
I continue now proposing these examples consequently for AP13, AP14:
with analogous change of label for AP13. The format for AP14 is a
challenge. I hope you like it {?}
*
for AP13 has stratigraphic relation to (is stratigraphically related by)*
The production of the floors at B of the building 1 in Çatalhöyük,
Turkey (E12) /has stratigraphic relation to/ the production of wall C
(A8) /has type/ after (E55). [as observed initally, see AP11] (Hodder 1999)
The production of the floors at B of the building 1 in Çatalhöyük,
Turkey (A8) /has physical relation/ /to/ the production of wall C (A8)
/has type/ before (E55). [as observed finally, see AP11] (Hodder 1999)
The production of the wall C of the building 1 in Çatalhöyük, Turkey
(A8) /has physical relation/ /to/ the production of wall D (A8) /has
type/ after (E55). [See AP11] (Hodder 1999)
The production of the wall D of the building 1 in Çatalhöyük, Turkey
(A8) /has physical relation/ /to/ the production of the floors B’ (A8)
/has type/ after (E55). [See AP11] (Hodder 1999)
*And for AP14 is justified by:*
{ The production of the floors at B of the building 1 in Çatalhöyük,
Turkey (E12) /has stratigraphic relation to/ the production of wall C
(A8) /has type/ before (E55) }
/is justified by/
{ The floors at B of the building 1 in Çatalhöyük, Turkey (A8) /has
physical relation/ /to/ wall C (A8) /has type/ a wall-slot cut for (E55)
}[See Ap11, AP13](Hodder 1999)
{ The production of the wall C of the building 1 in Çatalhöyük, Turkey
(A8) /has physical relation/ /to/ the production of wall D (A8) /has
type/ after (E55) }
/is justified by/
{ The wall C of the building 1 in Çatalhöyük, Turkey (A8) /has physical
relation/ /to/ wall D (A8) /has type/ abuts on (E55) } [See Ap11,
AP13](Hodder 1999)
Best,
Martin
On 2/20/2021 8:03 PM, Martin Doerr wrote:
ISSUE 474, Example of AP11
Dear All,
Creating the examples for AP11 together with Athina Kritsotaki, I
encountered a problem with the label.
I propose to change:
*OLD: AP11 has physical relation (is physical relation of)***
NEW: *AP11 has physical relation to (is physically related by)***
*Here my examples*
Examples for AP11 has physical relation to:
The floors at B of the building 1 in Çatalhöyük, Turkey (A8) /has
physical relation/ /to/ wall C (A8) /has type/ runs up to (E55). [as
observed initally, see below] (Hodder 1999)
The floors at B of the building 1 in Çatalhöyük, Turkey (A8) /has
physical relation/ /to/ wall C (A8) /has type/ a wall-slot cut for
(E55). [as observed finally, see below] (Hodder 1999)
The wall C of the building 1 in Çatalhöyük, Turkey (A8) /has physical
relation/ /to/ wall D (A8) /has type/ abuts on (E55). (Hodder 1999)
The wall D of the building 1 in Çatalhöyük, Turkey (A8) /has physical
relation/ /to/ the floors B’ (A8) /has type/ on top of (E55). (Hodder
1999)
[Ian Hodder 1999, pp 40-42, describes an example of stratigraphic
reasoning and knowledge revisions: “..In the following case taken from
Catalhoyuk....we need to look at the plan of Building 1 in figure 3.4.
During the excavation of this building in 1996 we came down onto a
series of floors at B within the walls C, D, etc. Our first impression
was that the floors at B ran up to and were later than wall C…. a
later pit F had cut through wall C and floors B. This meant that we
could test the idea that the floors were later than the wall.
Observation showed that the test could be verified. The C floors did
indeed run up to the wall as suggested in inset L (fig 3.4). But as
more evidence was put together, it did not fit. We came to realize
that the floor B’ was earlier than rubble beneath D. Wall C clearly
abutted and was later than wall D. Thus, as we understood the
building, the B floors were later than wall C which was later than
wall D. And at the same time the B’ floors, which were the same floors
as the B floors, were earlier than wall D. The evidence did not make
sense……we realized…there was a break between the B floors and the wall
C. Our mistake was to assume that the floors on either side of wall C
were contemporary. But they were not. Floors were added in the north
side of wall C after the south side had gone out of use…”]
--
------------------------------------
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
Institute of Computer Science
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,
GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece
Vox:+30(2810)391625
Email: mar...@ics.forth.gr
Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
