Vielen Dank für die Nachricht! Ich bin am ersten Werktag nach dem 15.04. wieder erreichbar. Die Nachricht wird nicht weitergeleitet.
Mit besten Grüßen Zoe Schubert Am 26.03.2022 um 21:44 schrieb Pat Riva via Crm-sig <crm-sig@ics.forth.gr>: > Yes > > Pat Riva > Acting University Librarian / Bibliothécaire en chef par intérim > Concordia University / Université Concordia > 1455 de Maisonneuve West, LB-331 > Montréal, Québec H3G 1M8 > Canada > pat.r...@concordia.ca > > > > From: Crm-sig <crm-sig-boun...@ics.forth.gr> on behalf of Christian-Emil > Smith Ore via Crm-sig <crm-sig@ics.forth.gr> > Sent: March 21, 2022 7:24 AM > To: crm-sig <Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr> > Subject: [Crm-sig] E-vote for scope note part of issue 294 (CRMarchaeo) > > Dear all, > As the issue number indicates issue 294 has been with for a while. > > In the 49th joint meeting of the CIDOC CRM SIG and SO/TC46/SC4/WG9; 42nd FRBR > – CIDOC CRM Harmonization meeting, the sig accepted MD's proposal to change > the quantification of appears in, restricted to, typical for to > many-to-many, as well as redraft their scope notes. The properties will be > assigned the following AP numbers: > • AP29 appears in > • AP30 restricted to > • AP31 typical for > The new scope notes are working definitions. The relations among types (issue > 407) be taken into account, together with skos and other standards. > HW: SdS to edit them. > The edited version of the scope notes can be found here (and copied in a the > end of this email: > > https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1qS8aBP3UVLGn-WAXH6aH2vZp4wy1ME3t > > > > You are invited to vote on the scope note texts (not the name of the inverses > which will be a separate e-vote) > > > YES if you accept the edited texts > NO if you don't accept the edited texts > VETO if you think a e-vote is not ok at the current state > > > The voting is open until 4th April. > > > Best, > Christian-Emil > > > > > > 294: E55 Type relations > The SdS edits. The original text is highlighted in Yellow to make it easier > to follow the differences. > > > OLD > AP29 appears in > Domain: E55 Type > Range: E4 Period > Subproperty: > Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n) > Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an > instance of E55) to an instance of E4 > Period for indicating that objects of this kind have been generated within > this period. The > generation of such objects may be the result of human, biological, geological > or other processes. > This property makes a weak statement with regards to the distribution of the > class of object in the > archaeological record, but also in geological or paleontological > observations: If the genesis of an > object of this type can plausibly be assumed to fall within the genesis of > the context in which it > was found, then the statement made with this property would support > reasoning, ceteris paribus, > that the genesis period of the find context forms part of or overlaps with > one of the instance of E4 > Period in which the respective object type has appeared. > Stronger claims can be made using ‘typical for’ and ‘restricted to’ > properties. > > NEW > AP29 appears in > Domain: E55 Type > Range: E4 Period > Subproperty: > Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n) > Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an > instance of E55 Type) with an > instance of E4 Period indicating that objects of this kind have been brought > into existence during > this period. The genesis of such objects may be the result of human, > biological, geological or other > processes. > This property makes a weak statement about the distribution of the associated > object kind in the > archaeological record: that is, if the genesis of an object of the type can > plausibly be assumed to > fall within the genesis of the context within which it was found, then this > property supports > reasoning, ceteris paribus, that the genesis period of the context forms part > of, or overlaps with, > one of the instances of E4 Period in which the respective object type has > appeared. Such weak > statements may also be useful in the context of geological or paleontological > observations. > Stronger claims can be made using the properties AP30 restricted to and AP31 > typical for. > > OLD > AP30 restricted to > Domain: E55 Type > Range: E4 Period > Subproperty: appears in > Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n) > Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an > instance of E55) to an instance of E4 > Period for indicating that objects of this kind have exclusively been > generated in this period. > This property makes a strong statement concerning the distribution of the > kind of object in the > observation record: If the genesis of an object of this type can plausibly be > assumed to fall within > the genesis of the context in which it was found, then the statement made > with this property would > support reasoning, ceteris paribus, that the genesis period of the find > context actually forms part of > the related instance of E4 Period, or at least overlaps with it. > In contrast, objects from previous periods may appear in a context because > they are still in use, > and objects from later periods may have been pushed into an older context. > Weaker claims can be made using the properties ‘typical for’ and ‘appears in’. > > In First Order Logic: > […] > AP30(x,y) ∧ AP30(x,z) ⇒ P132(y,z) > > NEW > AP30 restricted to > Domain: E55 Type > Range: E4 Period > Subproperty: AP29 appears in > Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n) > Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an > instance of E55 Type) with an > instance of E4 Period indicating that objects of this kind have been > generated exclusively in this > period. > This property makes a strong statement concerning the distribution of the > associated object kind in > the observed record: If the genesis of an object of this type can plausibly > be assumed to fall within > the genesis of the context in which it was found, then the statement made > with this property would > support reasoning, ceteris paribus, that the genesis period of the find > context actually forms part of > the related instance of E4 Period, or at least overlaps with it. > In contrast, objects from previous periods may appear in a context because > they are still in use, > and objects from later periods may have been displaced into an older context. > Weaker claims can be made using the properties AP29 appears in and AP31 > typical for. > > In First Order Logic: > […] > AP30(x,y) ∧ AP30(x,z) ⇒ P132(y,z) > > OLD > AP31 typical for > Domain: E55 Type > Range: E4 Period > Subproperty: AP29 appears in > Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n) > Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an > instance of E55 Type) to an instance > of E4 Period for indicating that objects of this kind have been generated in > this period in > significantly higher numbers and wider distribution, than in other periods. > This property makes a moderate statement concerning the distribution of the > kind of object in the > observation record: If a sufficient number of objects of this type are found > in some context, and > their genesis can plausibly be assumed to fall within the genesis of the find > context, then the > statement made with this property would support reasoning, ceteris paribus, > that the genesis period > of the find context is likely to forms part of the related instance of E4 > Period, or at least overlaps > with it. “Sufficient number” means that the density of objects of this kind > in the find context is > compatible with the general density this kind of object had in the respective > period in comparable > contexts and deposition history. > A stronger claim can be made using ‘restricted to’ while a weaker claim is > made using ‘appears > in'. > > NEW > AP31 typical for > Domain: E55 Type > Range: E4 Period > Subproperty: AP29 appears in > Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n) > Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an > instance of E55 Type) with an > instance of E4 Period indicating that objects of this kind have been > generated in this period in > significantly greater numbers and in wider distributions, than in other > periods. > This property makes a moderate statement concerning the distribution of the > associated object > kind in the observed record: If a "sufficient number" of objects of > this type are found in a context, > and their genesis can plausibly be assumed to fall within the genesis of the > find context, then the > statement made with this property would support reasoning, ceteris paribus, > that the genesis > period of the find context is likely to form part of the related instance of > E4 Period, or at least > overlap with it. “Sufficient number” means that the density of objects of > this kind in the find > context is compatible with the general density that this kind of object had > during the associated > period in contexts of a comparable nature and deposition history. > A stronger claim can be made using AP30 restricted to while a weaker claim > would use AP29 > appears in. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Crm-sig mailing list > Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr > http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
_______________________________________________ Crm-sig mailing list Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
