YES On Tue, Nov 1, 2022, 11:02 George Bruseker via Crm-sig <crm-sig@ics.forth.gr> wrote:
> Dear all, > > I propose the deletion of the following classes of CRMdig. The reason that > each should be deleted is listed beside it, but there are two basic, > principled reasons for the proposal: > > 1) the class can be modelled using a more generic pattern from CRMbase or > CRMdig without loss of semantic valence > 2) the class violates a CIDOC CRM modelling principle / best practice, an > alternative mode of expressing it already exists using standard modelling > in CRM and SHOULD be employed > > Therefore, if our proposal is done correctly removing all these classes > will serve to a) make the model lighter but just as semantically powerful, > b) accord with CRM SIG general modelling principles and c) serve better as > a middle level domain ontology for its area of scope. > > Martin Doerr, Rob Sanderson and Nicola Carboni have all contributed over > time to this review or properties alongside myself as proposer. Any > mistakes being mine. > > With that as background here are the proposed deletions: > > *D21 Person Name*: Obvious reasons. We already have a general E41 > Appellation class and we do not specialize name classes endlessly but use > the p2 has type formulation. > > *D23 Room*: Convenience class that is in fact not that convenient: use > E53 Place > > This is a first list to which others may be added. At this time, I am > happy to propose the above list for deletion as hopefully relatively > uncontroversial. > > You can find the specification for CRMdig here: > https://cidoc-crm.org/crmdig/sites/default/files/CRMdig_v3.2.1.pdf > > To read more on these classes. > > There are other problematic classes which need to be reanalyzed before > they are considered for deletion or reworking. Separate issues will be > raised for each of these as necessary. > > I call a vote now, ending on Nov 11. Please vote by answering YES to this > emaill thread if you agree to these deletions or NO. If you vote NO, please > indicate if you vote NO to all or if you vote NO to some part of the > proposal. > > Thanks in advance for your interest and participation. > > Best, > > George > Vice Chair CRM SIG > > -- > George Bruseker, PhD > Chief Executive Officer > Takin.solutions Ltd. > https://www.takin.solutions/ > _______________________________________________ > Crm-sig mailing list > Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr > http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig >
_______________________________________________ Crm-sig mailing list Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
