Dear All,
I think this should go for an e-vote, update to include future 7.1.3.
Best,
Martin
On 2/6/2023 12:41 PM, Wolfgang Schmidle via Crm-sig wrote:
Dear All,
There are some properties where the text version and the number version of
their property quantification do not match. Since both should express the same
information, either the text version or the number version (or both) must be
wrong. Martin and I have worked to resolve these cases.
Results:
P10 many to many, necessary, dependent (1,n:1,n)
P81 many to many, necessary (1,n:0,n)
P89 many to many, necessary, dependent (1,n:1,n)
P99 one to many, necessary (1,n:0,1)
P161 many to many, necessary (1,n:0,n)
P187 one to many, necessary (1,n:0,1)
P188 many to many (0,n:0,n)
P191 many to one, necessary (1,1:0,n)
P198 many to many (0,n:0,n)
Details see here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1p4Ew-vKigz5Lm3H69nrlbk2Xfe8gioun87COJmKFfXY/edit#gid=307539608
Best,
Wolfgang
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
--
------------------------------------
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
Institute of Computer Science
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,
GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece
Vox:+30(2810)391625
Email: mar...@ics.forth.gr
Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
