Dear All,
I suggest to discuss the meaning of I4 Proposition Set, also related to
issue 550, 510, 610
Two problems:
A) the content model. If we follow the *logic of P190*, an I4
Proposition Set should be represented by a URI and a content model,
which could be implemented as Named Graph in a KB.
If we take an I4 as a Propositional Object, we would still need a
symbolic form, which would need a representative copy (or P190).
B) If we take an I4 as *fitting potentially the reality* under
discourse, or only as a "possible world" being discussed, we need to
clarify this role. Using I2 Belief, we relate the Proposition Set to be
"true" or "false". We need to clarify, if "true" means "real", if the
propositions can be related to reality. Similarly, we need to clarify,
if an I11 Situation, as a special case, is meant to be discussed as
statements only, or, if "observed", to *exist *in reality. We need to
interpret the link to an observation is implying its reality or not.
This is particularly interesting if we observe an area and state it does
NOT contain X.
C) We should clarify how we may refer to Proposition Sets with a human
readable text, rather than a CRM compatible RDF model.
Best,
Martin
--
------------------------------------
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
Institute of Computer Science
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,
GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece
Vox:+30(2810)391625
Email:mar...@ics.forth.gr
Web-site:http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
