Dear All,
Referring to:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1M4nOyiRarQ2Qv4eVdmEqAxCx6WUe5WmtzLLos8r23mY/edit
In principle, PR1, PR2 is incompatible with I2, because it replaces the
Proposition Set by a reification (one property) construct. However, we
are discussing in Issue 614 the transition from one property to a
proposition set:
I proposed for 614:
"Finally, observing or assigning a single property (E13) can be
described as a shortcut to a content model held to be true...."Further,
instead of PR1, we can define a "Vulnerability Proposition Set",
prescribing general constraints about its content model, which includes
the assignment of a etc. to this thing, following the pattern of
"Jxx9 is about provenance of (has provenance claim): E70 Thing" from
Belief Adoption.
Constraints for content models of Proposition Sets are necessary in
general, e.g., for defining an "observable situation", we need a list of
possible properties.
Best,
Martin
--
------------------------------------
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
Institute of Computer Science
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,
GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece
Vox:+30(2810)391625
Email:mar...@ics.forth.gr
Web-site:http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
