Dear Eleni,

I'd suggest not to assign inverse labels, nevertheless. These primitive values do not constitute particular objects of discourse, albeit that there is a naming aspect.

P170, P168, P169 are different, they are epistemic constructs. Anyway, to be discussed!

Best,

Martin

On 2/8/2024 10:10 AM, Eleni Tsouloucha via Crm-sig wrote:
Dear all,

Since we made E61 isA E59 AND E41, it means that there can be inverse properties for /P81 ongoing throughout/ & /P82 at some time within/. Which is implicit in the FOL for /P170 defines time (time is defined by) --/see v7.1.2 <https://cidoc-crm.org/html/cidoc_crm_v7.1.2.html#P170> (Official (Base for initial ISO Submission) and v7.2.3// <https://cidoc-crm.org/Version/version-7.2.3>(draft, community version).

In first-order logic:
P170(x,y) ⇒ E61(x)
P170(x,y) ⇒ E52(y)
*P170(x, y) ⇒ P81i(x, y) ∧ P82i(x, y)*
Incidentally, we have documented that *P170(x,y) ⇒ P81(y,x) ˄ P82(y,x) *(see issue**508 <https://cidoc-crm.org/Issue/ID-508-fol-for-p170>*, *Martin's post on 23 July 2020 specifically), which got translated into listing the inverse forms of P81/P82, without bothering to revisit the lack of inverse forms for respective properties.

The same situation holds for /P171 at some place within/ and /P172 contains/ (whose ranges are set to E94 Space Primitive). Now that E94 isA E59 AND E41, we should define inverse properties for them (and these should have labels).

Best,

Eleni

_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig


--
------------------------------------
 Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
 Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
 Institute of Computer Science
 Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,
 GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece
Email:mar...@ics.forth.gr Web-site:http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

Reply via email to