On Tuesday 20 November 2012 03:25:56 Jon Masters wrote: > The only reason for making a change at this time appears to be cosmetic, > for removing /lib for example. I can understand that, and if we were > discussing this a year ago (or even months ago when I first raised it on > this list), then it might be a reasonable change, but at this time I > cannot find an overwhelming technical justification.
i don't think removal of /lib/ is really feasible. that's the path that gets used for firmware (/lib/firmware/) and kernel modules (/lib/modules/<kver>/) regardless of the default ABI on the system. similarly, userspace packages are using that path for supplemental files like the bootloader (grub) or ABI-independent settings (udev rules). -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cross-distro mailing list cross-distro@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-distro
