So ... to be explicit ... there's nothing "we" need to do differently to take advantage of "better cleanup" ... that this was just to overcome a bug or limitation with Hudson?
We still can't (and are not expected to) shell over to one of the Hudson slave's and do "rm -fr" to clean up anything ... right? Thanks, From: "Webmaster(Matt Ward)" <[email protected]> To: Cross project issues <[email protected]>, Date: 12/06/2011 11:48 AM Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev] Hudson change Sent by: [email protected] Hi Folks, As some of you know we've been having some issues recently with Hudson not letting go of files which causes issues when people try to clean up their workspace. Denis and I have come up with a potential fix that will allow us to bypass NFS by mounting a disk image locally on the master that will contain the 'workspace' data. However I need to copy the current data over and then restart Hudson. While short notice my plan is to do this today starting at 3pm. I expect Hudson will be offline for about 20 minutes while the data syncs and I re-configure the master. if you absolutely must get your M build done and this will prevent that, please let me know ASAP. -Matt. -- Eclipse WebMaster - [email protected] Questions? Consult the WebMaster FAQ at http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Webmaster_FAQ View my status at http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/WebMaster EclipseCon 2012 <http://www.eclipsecon.org/2012> _______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev _______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
