IIRC, If it's not on the aggregator, we can't use it, and if it isn't in Juno it can't be part of aggregator. Besides AMP, which is comparatively small potatoes, there is GMF, Papyrus and all of the other graphical tools (including new ones like BPEL, etc..), so that would throw us all off. Aren't there some platform bits that consume Zest such as the dependency analyzer? (I guess that one is an add-on, now that I look.)
I think the number one issue as far as maintaining for train would be whether GEF itself has dependencies on 3.7 only features, right? Otherwise it should be quite simple to update the build for e4. On Dec 13, 2011, at 8:33 PM, Ian Bull wrote: > Wayne, > > What happens if a 'producer' doesn't sign up for the train? What I mean is, > what happens if GEF -- which has historically been consumed by other projects > -- is not part of the train? Will the previous years bytes be available? Is > anybody who depends on GEF automatically 'off the train'? > > Cheers, > Ian > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Wayne Beaton <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Bob. > > You need to go to the project metadata in the portal and set the "juno" bit > under the simultaneousrelease entry. > > Wayne > > > On 12/13/2011 05:29 PM, Bob Brodt wrote: >> Hi Wayne, >> >> BPEL is hoping to be a new project this year, so just wanted to make sure >> we're on the list :) >> >> Thanks! >> Bob Brodt >> >> According to the participation list [1], we have 59 projects participating. >> Remember that I need you to flip the bit in the portal to show that you're >> participating. Sooner would be better than later. >> >> I did a quick run through of the project and have observed that the >> following projects are MIA from last year: >> AMP >> EMF Query >> EMF Transaction >> EMF Validation >> GEF >> GMF-Notation >> Mobile Tools For Java (MTJ) >> QVT Operational >> Sequoyah >> The math doesn't add up, so I've made a mistake somewhere... I may have to >> write a query. More later. >> >> Let me know if you're having trouble. >> >> Wayne >> >> [1] http://eclipse.org/projects/releases/releases.php >> >> On 12/13/2011 05:06 PM, David M Williams wrote: >> Or, are you all just getting good at this? :) >> >> Everything seems to be going well with contributions to M4 aggregation, but >> thought I'd send a reminder there's only one day left to get contributions >> in for M4. We'll consider 5 PM Wednesday the deadline, unless someone says >> "wait, almost ready". >> >> Thanks, >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >> >> >> -- >> Wayne Beaton >> The Eclipse Foundation >> Twitter: @waynebeaton >> <unnamed.png><unnamed.gif> >> >> Q >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > > -- > Wayne Beaton > The Eclipse Foundation > Twitter: @waynebeaton > <138x38.png><logo138x38.gif> > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > > > > > -- > R. Ian Bull | EclipseSource Victoria | +1 250 477 7484 > http://eclipsesource.com | http://twitter.com/eclipsesource > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
