Hi David, Just a quick question: I've seen you kept our SR1 contribution for Sequoyah, and as we are almost on maintenance, we don't have any bugfixes for SR2. Do I *need* to generate another build, with a x.y.2 version or can we keep this x.y.1, since the code will be the same?
And thanks for your quick help over all these warm-up weeks! :) On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 17:58, David M Williams <david_willi...@us.ibm.com>wrote: > > tick tock > > Here we are already at 3 PM on +3 day. Unless someone shouts "wait", I'll > consider the updates for RC1 finished by 5 PM today (Eastern), and what > ever build is current will then become our "maintenance" staging repo for > RC1. > > http://download.eclipse.org/releases/maintenance/ > > There are two contribution files that have disabled features or > repositories ... riena being the largest omission ... last call! :) > > ep.b3aggrcon (see bug 362103) > riena.b3aggrcon > > Markus tells me, in keeping with tradition, he will produce the EPP > packages with the same spirit of "warm-up" (not moved to downloads, not > mirrored, no official sign-off, but the maintainers (or, anyone) can still > test from the EPP build site. > > In two short weeks we'll produce RC2 which overlaps with Juno M5! ... so, > plan accordingly ... I'm sure we'll be keeping the build machine(s) warm > that week. > > Indigo: http://wiki.eclipse.org/Indigo/Simultaneous_Release_Plan#SR2 > Juno: http://wiki.eclipse.org/Juno/Simultaneous_Release_Plan#Schedule > > > Thanks, > > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > -- Thanks, Daniel Pastore
_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev