On 02/23/2012 09:59 AM, Mickael Istria wrote: > When it is done, I'd be glad to have feedback on the overall > performance benefit of moving just one job. It's just saving 100MB on > a 2GB JVM. If nothing changed, then I'll annoy to get job is back on > hudson.eclipse.org.
The background for all this is bug 367238. It is called "improve Hudson stability and performance" and it is marked "critical". I've put a number of bugs as dependencies to that bug. As I've mentioned, closing only one of the blockers will not fix the issue, but when a job consumes 10x the amount of RAM of other jobs, it is clearly misbehaving. Let's resume this discussion on the appropriate bugs. Thanks. Denis
_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
