I always thought that we should make it a requirement for Simultaneous
Release participation that a project has a listing with its features
together with a pointer to the aggregated repository - I think I wrote this
somewhere in a bug. Maybe in a separate category that is generated by the
data already available from the portal and the p2 metadata.

Markus
 On May 29, 2012 6:42 PM, "Mike Milinkovich" <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Just my personal opinion, but given that the Marketplace Client is quite
> popular and is included in almost all of the packages, I would recommend
> that Eclipse projects take the time to make their project distributions
> available via that channel.****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Konstantin
> Komissarchik
> *Sent:* May-29-12 12:39 PM
> *To:* 'Cross project issues'
> *Subject:* Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Target audience of Juno repo****
>
> ** **
>
> Trying to fragment the repository around user profiles isn’t going to be
> easy or clean. Many users and use cases will not easily fit into neat
> profiles.****
>
> ** **
>
> On the other hand, we already have a venue for presenting users with an
> easier to use course-granularity installation option… Eclipse Marketplace.
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> - Konstantin****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Miles Parker
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 29, 2012 9:25 AM
> *To:* Cross project issues
> *Subject:* Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Target audience of Juno repo****
>
> ** **
>
>
> +1, but probably way too late to be asking people to make these kind of
> changes now. Something that people should be thinking hard about for
> Kepler. There is a major need for a higher level of granularity on the
> features. Ideally it would be one per project but that isn't practical in
> many cases.
>
> On 2012-05-29, at 8:29 AM, Pascal Rapicault wrote:
>
> ****
>
> Once in a while I go through the content of the Juno repo to see what's
> there; and I try to see if I can make any sense of what is made available.
> Unfortunately this year it reached a point where I just can't. There are
> way too many entries that are subtle variations around the same project and
> whose installation result in unexpected results or non functional additions
> to my install. For example there is 11 entries for Sapphire, 5 entries for
> windowBuilder, an infinity of Mylyn related entries...?****
>
> ** **
>
> I understand that we are all trying to promote our project and brand, but
> I would argue that the plethora of entries has a reverse effect that let
> the user confused as to what to install.****
>
> ** **
>
> So the main question is "what is the primary target audience of the Juno
> repo?"****
>
>             - an eclipse user - e.g. a JEE programmer****
>
>             - an eclipse extender - e.g. someone using eclipse
> technologies to build an app****
>
> ** **
>
> At this point, the content of the repo looks like what we are addressing
> both audience which may be a convenience for us but a nuisance for the end
> users. ****
>
> ** **
>
> IMO, the Juno repo should be "end user" focused and only include entries
> whose installation will result in new functionalities to be added to the
> IDE. Also each entry should have****
>
>             - a descriptive name (which include removing adjectives such
> as incubation, extender)****
>
>             - a minimal number of entries returned when I search for the
> name****
>
>             - be adequately categorized****
>
> ** **
>
> How do we go about exposing the rest of the content for extenders?****
>
>             - Different repo URLs (e.g.
> download.eclipse.org/releases/juno/developer)****
>
>             - Addition of a developer focused category (with nested
> categories)****
>
> ** **
>
> wdyt?****
>
> ** **
>
> Pascal****
>
> _______________________________________________****
>
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list****
>
> [email protected]****
>
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev****
>
> ** **
>
> ______________________________****
>
> Miles T. Parker****
>
> Senior Solutions Architect****
>
> Tasktop****
>
> http://tasktop.com****
>
> Committer, Eclipse Mylyn and Virgo****
>
> Project Lead, Model Focussing Tools and AMP****
>
> http://milesparker.blogspot.com****
>
> skype: milestravisparker****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Reply via email to