yep, that is much improved, thanks! jesse
-- jesse mcconnell jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Denis Roy <denis....@eclipse.org> wrote: > Thanks for pointing that out. I've done some edits to (hopefully) > clarify things. > > > Denis > > > On 06/12/2012 12:00 PM, Jesse McConnell wrote: >> I'll just point out the obvious confusing detail on that page, >> >> In Services Covered: >> >> Tier 2 is _called_ Best Effort >> >> yet in Service Availability: >> >> Tier 3 is actually Best Effort, while Tier 2 is 99% >> >> cheers, >> jesse >> >> -- >> jesse mcconnell >> jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Denis Roy <denis....@eclipse.org> wrote: >>> On 06/12/2012 09:38 AM, Benjamin Cabé wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>>> Hudson is a tier-3 service, meaning webmasters invest their "best >>>>> effort" in keeping it alive. >>>> It is listed in the tier-2 section on the Wiki page [1], is this a mistake >>>> then? >>>> >>> Apologies, it was a typo in my email. The SLA doc is correct. >>> >>> >>> Denis > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev _______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
