I've just updated emf query2 contribution, per bug 381786. 

Getting close now? 





From:   Kentarou Fukuda <kenta...@jp.ibm.com>
To:     Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>, 
Cc:     Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>, 
cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
Date:   06/13/2012 02:49 PM
Subject:        Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Fw: Failures in the Hudson 
Juno    run.aggregator job?
Sent by:        cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org



Hi,

I think (hope) problem in ACTF was cleared. But, I noticed that 
aggregation build was stopped by other problem.
Are there any changes in emf/query2?

     [exec] Mirroring artifacts from 
file:///home/data/httpd/download.eclipse.org/modeling/emf/query2/updates/1.0

     [exec] Build failed! Exception was 
org.eclipse.equinox.p2.core.ProvisionException: No repository found at 
file:///home/data/httpd/download.eclipse.org/modeling/emf/query2/updates/1.0

.
     [exec] No repository found at 
file:///home/data/httpd/download.eclipse.org/modeling/emf/query2/updates/1.0

.

Many thanks,
Kentarou
---
Kentarou Fukuda, Ph.D.
IBM Research - Tokyo
Tel: +81-3-5144-2852
E-mail: kenta...@jp.ibm.com

cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org wrote on 2012/06/14 01:24:46:

> From: Kentarou Fukuda/Japan/IBM@IBMJP
> To: Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>
> Cc: Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>, 
> cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
> Date: 2012/06/14 01:24
> Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Fw: Failures in the Hudson 
> Juno run.aggregator job?
> Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
> 
> Hi,
> 
> >the aggregation on build.eclipse.org seems to be doing ok. 
> 
> We couldn't fix the problem yet. It seems that ACTF is disabled in 
current 
> aggregation build.
> 
> I disabled ACTF aggregation again, and will try it later.
> 
> Best regards,
> Kentarou
> ---
> Kentarou Fukuda, Ph.D.
> IBM Research - Tokyo
> Tel: +81-3-5144-2852
> E-mail: kenta...@jp.ibm.com
> 
> 
> 
> From:   David M Williams <david_willi...@us.ibm.com>
> To:     Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>
> Date:   2012/06/14 01:12
> Subject:        Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Fw: Failures in the 
Hudson 
> Juno    run.aggregator job?
> Sent by:        cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
> 
> 
> 
> Ok, and ... maybe "you" fixed it already? :) 
> I made my statement based on my "local" build, which gave (and still 
> gives) the error below ... but, the aggregation on build.eclipse.org 
seems 
> to be doing ok. So ... not sure if what's causing that difference. 
> 
> Cannot complete the install because one or more required items could not 


> be found. 
> Missing requirement: ACTF Visualization Extension for PDT Feature 
> 1.0.0.R201206130735 (org.eclipse.actf.visualization.ui.pdt.feature.group 


> 1.0.0.R201206130735) requires 
> 'org.eclipse.actf.visualization.feature.group 0.0.0' but it could not be 


> found 
> 
> InstallableUnit(org.eclipse.actf.visualization.feature.group) is 
required 
> by: 
>   ValidationSet(main) 
>     Contribution(ACTF) 
>       MappedRepository(
> http://download.eclipse.org/technology/actf/1.0/update-site/) 
>         Feature(org.eclipse.actf.visualization.ui.pdt.feature.group 
> 1.0.0.R201206130735) 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From:        Kentarou Fukuda <kenta...@jp.ibm.com> 
> To:        Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>, 
> Cc:        Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>, 
> cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org 
> Date:        06/13/2012 12:08 PM 
> Subject:        Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Fw: Failures in the 
Hudson 
> Juno        run.aggregator job? 
> Sent by:        cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi David,
> 
> I'm now working for ACTF...  Our new build will be available in several 
> minutes, but I'm not sure it can be ready for next aggregation build.
> 
> If we can't fix the issue soon, I'll go back to our older build methods.
> 
> Best regards,
> Kentarou
> ---
> Kentarou Fukuda, Ph.D.
> IBM Research - Tokyo
> Tel: +81-3-5144-2852
> E-mail: kenta...@jp.ibm.com
> 
> 
> 
> From:   David M Williams <david_willi...@us.ibm.com>
> To:     Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>
> Date:   2012/06/14 01:02
> Subject:        Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Fw: Failures in the 
Hudson 
> Juno    run.aggregator job?
> Sent by:        cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
> 
> 
> 
> Next update: 
> Mylyn's fixed (moved/copied) their repo. 
> Next problem that showed up was a Jubula ripple effect due to 
EclipseLink 
> repo being disabled (ignore that, I went back and disabled EclipseLink 
> feature only, instead of whole repo so Jubula can "find" what it needs 
for 
> 
> now). 
> 
> Next was an ACTF problem. I saw that early ... so, will need to 
> investigate, but its a leaf component so I think we can temporarily 
> disable unless we hear something from the team soon ... say in the next 
3 
> minutes? 
> 
> Thanks, 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From:        David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS 
> To:        Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>, 
> Date:        06/13/2012 11:57 AM 
> Subject:        [cross-project-issues-dev] Fw: Failures in the Hudson 
Juno 
> 
>       run.aggregator job? 
> Sent by:        cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org 
> 
> 
> 
> Update ... Eric said to temporarily disable EclipseLink, and he'll try 
to 
> rebuild to avoid this dependency ... we'll see who shows up next. 
> 
> [FYI, it is helpful, if you get a not about your project failing, to 
keep 
> us all informed, here on cross-project list. I know many are waiting for 

a 
> 
> "green build"]. 
> 
> 
> ----- Forwarded by David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM on 06/13/2012 11:48 AM 
> ----- 
> 
> From:        David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM 
> To:        Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>, 
> Date:        06/13/2012 11:45 AM 
> Subject:        Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Failures in the Hudson 
Juno 
> 
>       run.aggregator job? 
> 
> 
> 
> Nope, just me (just kidding). The current "visible" problem is with 
> EclipseLink but ... just so everyone else knows what we (don't) know ... 


> we've exchanged some notes and something "mysterious" is going on. 
Current 
> 
> theory is that "mylyn's" whole repo is missing ... waiting to hear from 
> them ... here's the exchange so far ... if anyone has recently removed 
> ejb_3.1.0 from their repo, can you let us know? 
> 
> 
> > > David,
> > > 
> > > I'm curious why this is happening now. This same build has been 
> > > submitted since last Thursday or Friday, and is only failing today.
> > > 
> > > After review it looks legitimate and we are investigating what we 
> > > should do about it, but the issue looks like it had been masked, and
> > > I'm wondering if the masking is permanently removed, or if this 
> > > failure will in essence be temporary.
> > > 
> > > The problem is that we aren't building our repo with the ejb_3.1.0 
> > > dependency (we don't put it in plugins and the features don't depend
> > > upon it - but a jar would depend upon the classes. The jar in 
> > > question is a special case though as it would only be used in a 
> > > container where the classes already exist - so actually shipping the
> > > jar would be superfluous).
> > > 
> > > -Eric 
> 
> > Eric, 
> > Hmm, not sure ... it could be you (or, aggregator) was "picking it 
> > up" from someone's else repo and they have changed their repo. 
> > 
> > And, I think Mylyn's repo is currently "not present at all". Does 
> > this sound like the kind of think that Mylyn might have in their repo? 


> > David 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From:        Jeff Johnston <jjohn...@redhat.com> 
> To:        Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>, 
> Date:        06/13/2012 11:34 AM 
> Subject:        [cross-project-issues-dev] Failures in the Hudson Juno 
> run.aggregator job? 
> Sent by:        cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org 
> 
> 
> 
> I noticed that the Juno run.aggregator job is failing on Hudson after a 
> bunch of RC4 changes.  Is someone assigned to each of the issues (other 
> than David)?
> 
> -- Jeff J.
> _______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
> _______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
> 

_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Reply via email to