My answer: It's something I expect the PMC to provide. Which PMC that is, is being discussed on another thread somewhere.
Doug. From: Mickael Istria <mist...@redhat.com<mailto:mist...@redhat.com>> Reply-To: Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org<mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>> Date: Wednesday, 17 July, 2013 11:53 AM To: "mike.milinkov...@eclipse.org<mailto:mike.milinkov...@eclipse.org>" <mike.milinkov...@eclipse.org<mailto:mike.milinkov...@eclipse.org>>, Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org<mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>> Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Preferences (topic was touched in "Eclipse smells kind of dead" thread) On 07/17/2013 04:29 PM, Mike Milinkovich wrote: If we’re looking for user feedback, reading the article and comments here[1] would be helpful. Gathering the feedback and reacting to it based on end-users request is not something Eclipse contributors generally excel at doing. The main entry-point for contributors is Bugzilla, which doesn't reflect the real concerns of most users. I guess having the Foundation gathering such external feedback and create reports per project saying "Here is what people like and didn't like about your project in the last 3 monthes" could help project to identify what is critical for better adoption. Is this something we could imagine the Foundation to provide ? Does it make sense? -- Mickael Istria Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat<http://www.jboss.org/tools> My blog<http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets<http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
