I'm with David on this one. The simrel repo is supposed to be the aggregation of all the project builds. If you are building against an old simrel repo, chances are you aren't building against the bits that will appear with your bits in this round's simrel repo. Doesn't that open up the potential for bad things?
Doug. On 13-08-21 7:29 AM, "Igor Fedorenko" <ifedore...@sonatype.com> wrote: >I did the same, too. I simply don't have the time needed to maintain >list of project-level repositories and will build against kepler until I >can switch to luna simrel repo. > >-- >Regards, >Igor > >On 2013-08-21 4:05 AM, Marcel Bruch wrote: >> Maybe it would help if project could publish a (stable) URL of their >> latest Luna artifacts on a common wiki page? I had trouble to find all >> dependencies and features to set up our target platform accordingly two >> weeks ago. So decided to build the software against Kepler instead. >> >> Best, >> Marcel >> >> On Aug 21, 2013, at 9:57 AM, David M Williams <david_willi...@us.ibm.com >> <mailto:david_willi...@us.ibm.com>> wrote: >> >>> Yes, has been discussed before, and I said "bad idea", because anyone >>> building for the Luna repository, should not be building against the >>> Luna repository. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Eike Stepper <step...@esc-net.de <mailto:step...@esc-net.de>> >>> To: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >>> <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>, >>> Date: 08/21/2013 03:49 AM >>> Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev] Pre-M1 Aggregation Repository >>> Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org >>> <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org> >>> >>>------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I noticed that an empty Luna repository had been created some time >>> after the release of Kepler. An empty repository is >>> not really useful as a source for build dependencies and I wondered if >>> it would make sense in the future to seed the new >>> repository with the old content. Would it? Has it been discussed >>>already? >>> >>> Cheers >>> /Eike >>> >>> ---- >>> http://www.esc-net.de <http://www.esc-net.de/> >>> http://thegordian.blogspot.com <http://thegordian.blogspot.com/> >>> http://twitter.com/eikestepper >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >>> <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org> >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >>> <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org> >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >> >_______________________________________________ >cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev _______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev