Wasn't there another deadline in February for new CQ submissions?
-- Regards, Igor On 12/16/2013, 9:36, Matthias Sohn wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Igor Fedorenko <i...@ifedorenko.com <mailto:i...@ifedorenko.com>> wrote: On 12/16/2013, 4:16, Mike Milinkovich wrote: On 15/12/2013 11:06 PM, Igor Fedorenko wrote: Problem is, maven 3.1.x includes Eclipse Aether and Eclipse Sisu binaries, both currently under incubation as eclipse technology project. What I don't understand is that if these projects are mature enough to be included in production versions of Maven, why don't you simply ask the projects to do a Release Review to get to Mature status? It's not that much work. I am not sure if the two projects pass "diversity" criterion, see [1] and [2] git stats for example. Even if the two projects do get their respective "mature" release in next few weeks, this will not give us enough time to integrate them into Maven, release new version of Maven and integrate the new version of Maven into m2e before Luna IP deadline, which I assume is in two months or so. [1] http://git.eclipse.org/c/__aether/aether-core.git/stats/?__period=q&ofs=10 <http://git.eclipse.org/c/aether/aether-core.git/stats/?period=q&ofs=10> [2] http://git.eclipse.org/c/sisu/__org.eclipse.sisu.inject.git/__stats/?period=q&ofs=10 <http://git.eclipse.org/c/sisu/org.eclipse.sisu.inject.git/stats/?period=q&ofs=10> last year the IP log deadline for Kepler was on May 24 http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg08897.html -- Matthias _______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev