I understand your frustration. I think your efforts would be better spent 
though trying to convince the community to action with hard data, like the 
number of users who are switching to Java 8 right now that can't figure out how 
to install the feature patch. Is there a bug report where this is being 
gathered?

Doug.

________________________________
From: [email protected] 
[[email protected]] on behalf of Konstantin 
Komissarchik [[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 5:03 PM
To: 'Cross project issues'
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Kepler SR3 for Java 8?

You seem to be saying that I don’t know how these releases are put together or 
who does the work. That’s low.

You are quite right that there is no consensus. It is quite sad to see this. 
There is lots of talk about needing to make ensure that Eclipse remains 
competitive, but when time comes to do something concretely towards that, there 
is little interest. Let there be no mistake, it is a bad completive position to 
have Eclipse ship official Java 8 support three months behind the competition. 
For developers immersed in Eclipse internals daily, it may not seem like a big 
deal to ask users to seek out and install various patches or to use a Luna 
pre-release build or to just wait, but average users don’t see it that way.

- Konstantin


From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Doug Schaefer
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 12:35 PM
To: [email protected]; Cross project issues
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Kepler SR3 for Java 8?

Yes, you have to remember, the Foundation doesn't put together releases, the 
projects do. And Mike is correct, there isn't consensus from the projects that 
a Kepler SR3 is warranted versus putting resources on Luna. The feature patch 
install is easy and just needs to be made more visible, as Mike is proposing to 
do.

Doug.

________________________________
From: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
 [[email protected]] on behalf of Mike Milinkovich 
[[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 1:43 PM
To: 'Cross project issues'
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Kepler SR3 for Java 8?
On 27/03/2014 1:28 PM, Konstantin Komissarchik wrote:
Well, it is more work, but it shouldn’t be a lot of work since the bulk of it 
is automated and I would think that the value to Eclipse community and Eclipse 
reputation would outweigh the investment.

My impression is that there is no consensus that a Kepler SR3 is desirable. 
That is part of the reason why we're proposing the steps outlined in my email 
from earlier today.

In any event, I think that posting on this thread was a mistake. I've started a 
new thread and will hopefully get some feedback on what the EF is proposing to 
do.
--
Mike Milinkovich
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
+1.613.220.3223
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Reply via email to