On 11/25/2014 08:54 PM, Greg Watson wrote:
we would need to determine which parts are unsupported and remove them.
I don't understand why you want to remove things that are not actively
supported any more? The fact that no-one currently plans to making
changes in those parts doesn't make that they need to be removed. RSE is
a mature project, and in its current state, it provides satisfaction to
some users, and I believe it could easily keep on providing value
without changing a single line of code nor doing any rebuild. The
project is still useful independently of whether it has active
contributors or not.
If it is possible that other active projects (such as TCF and
org.eclipse.remote) could be used in place of RSE, maybe it would be better to
direct effort towards these?
+1 for focusing on a single project to do one thing, but if RSE is
currently the most advanced on this topic (at least it has FTP/SFTP
support), I don't see the benefit on re-implementing the same thing in
other project, instead of just using what's already there.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
[email protected]
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
