I've raised the awareness of this issue to EMO. Feedbacks will come soon. Thanks for your patience.
Mikael > Le 30 mars 2017 à 00:30, Tom Schindl <tom.schi...@bestsolution.at> a écrit : > > Hi, > > e(fx)clipse is also using Travis the reason is that this is IMHO the > standard way for GitHub-Projects so it feels very natural to all > contributors. > > Tom > > On 29.03.17 19:48, Gorkem Ercan wrote: >> >> What is the reason for not using JIPP instances for builds? >> Instead of Travis? We have moved our Travis to Eclipse JIPP when >> we moved eclipse.jdt.ls to foundation and it works pretty OK for us? >> >> -- >> Gorkem >> >> On 29 Mar 2017, at 11:34, Jonah Graham wrote: >> >>> At the moment my build has been waiting for quite a while to build (> >>> 1 hour)[1] >>> >>> As the 5 job limit means that if a repo has a matrix with 5 jobs, one >>> commit on that repo uses the whole limit. For example, at the moment >>> Eclipse OMR has 4 jobs running for a single commit[2]. (Not to pick on >>> omr, it just happens to be running right now, other projects as >>> expected also have build matrixes). >>> >>>> Should we as Eclipse-projects-at-GitHub-community come up with some >>>> sort of recommendations? :) >>> >>> Yes. Any opening ideas? >>> >>> Jonah >>> >>> >>> >>> [1] https://travis-ci.org/eclipse/january/builds/216372647 >>> [2] https://travis-ci.org/eclipse/omr/builds/216340391 >>> ~~~ >>> Jonah Graham >>> Kichwa Coders Ltd. >>> www.kichwacoders.com >>> >>> >>> On 29 March 2017 at 12:03, Oliver Kopp <kopp....@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> 2017-03-29 9:37 GMT+02:00 Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com>: >>>> >>>>> I should be able to see all the eclipse builds that are currently >>>>> running. >>>> >>>> This would be interesting. >>>> >>>> Maybe, my solution is to move away from Travis to CircleCI or some >>>> other CI provider even though I like travis. I am afraid of the >>>> introduced heterogeneity somehow. Should we as >>>> Eclipse-projects-at-GitHub-community come up with some sort of >>>> recommendations? :) >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Oliver >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >>>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or >>>> unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or >>> unsubscribe from this list, visit >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >> _______________________________________________ >> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe >> from this list, visit >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > > > -- > Thomas Schindl, CTO > BestSolution.at EDV Systemhaus GmbH > Eduard-Bodem-Gasse 5-7, A-6020 Innsbruck > http://www.bestsolution.at/ > Reg. Nr. FN 222302s am Firmenbuchgericht Innsbruck > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from > this list, visit > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev Mikaël Barbero Eclipse Platform Developer & FEEP Technical Leader Eclipse Foundation E: mik...@eclipse.org T: (+33) 642 028 039
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
