Hi Carsten,

did any of the three scenarios previously result in an error? In other words: 
Was the problem reproducible for you and is that reproducible situation now 
fixed?

Thanks,
Marcel

> On 8. May 2017, at 13:34, Carsten Reckord <reck...@yatta.de> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I have tested the respin candidate with MPC, and it looks good. I've tested 3 
> scenarios, using the JavaEE EPP package:
> 
> 1. Neon.2 with Docker Tools and Oomph installed, updated to Neon.3a
> -> works, and the offending HttpClient is not installed
> 
> 2. Direct install of Neon.3a with Docker Tools and Oomph
> -> works, and the offending HttpClient is not installed
> 
> 3. Neon.3 with Docker Tools and Oomph installed, updated to Neon.3a
> -> this still contains the broken HttpClient (as mentioned before). However, 
> at least in my tests, it looks like it was only wired to bundles requiring 
> only the package subset actually present in the bundle, and there were no 
> wiring issues through package exports that I could see. Specifically, both 
> USS and MPC were wired to the 4.3.6 version, so that potential conflict was 
> resolved properly.
> 
> After the initial update, I ran each resulting Neon.3a instance a couple of 
> times with -clean and/or -initialize to see if that changed the wiring 
> somehow, but didn't run into problems.
> 
> Best,
> Carsten
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:cross-project-
>> issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Frederic Gurr
>> Sent: Thursday, May 4, 2017 1:18 AM
>> To: Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>
>> Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] [eclipse.org-planning-council]
>> Neon.3 update problem status
>> 
>> Hi Ed,
>> 
>> The corresponding EPP repository can be found here:
>> 
>> https://hudson.eclipse.org/packaging/job/neon.epp-tycho-
>> build/599/artifact/org.eclipse.epp.packages/archive/repository/
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Fred
>> 
>> On 28.04.2017 10:25, Ed Merks wrote:
>>> Fred,
>>> 
>>> If someone would let me know when there is a corresponding EPP
>>> repository available, I can do some further testing.   With regard to
>>> your specific question, if the p2.inf can specify an exact bundle
>>> version to remove that's probably a good idea.   And by exact I mean
>>> that it would only remove the known-to-be-broken versions of these
>>> bundles that no one should ever have used and no one should ever use in
>>> the future.  Those broken versions have never been in a "released"
>>> repository, except for Neon.3.  It should not remove newer versions of
>>> the fixed bundles, even though those might cause the same wiring
>>> problems.  That being said, I think a main contributing factor to the
>>> wiring problem is the constraints that were added to exclude higher
>>> versions.   I know for example that oomph and userstorage work fine with
>>> the latest versions of these bundles but it was constrained not to use
>>> to exclude the broken versions for Oomph 1.1.
>>> 
>>> I hope that everyone who added such constraints will be sure to remove
>>> them for Oxygen M7.  Oomph's 1.8 contribution to Oxygen will use and
>>> contribute the latest versions of those bundles...
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 27.04.2017 22:14, Frederic Gurr wrote:
>>>> Open questions:
>>>> - Do we need to use the uninstall command in p2.inf to remove old Http*
>>>> bundles for users that already upgraded to Neon.3 and have a broken
>>>> setup at the moment? How would that affect 3rd party plugins that might
>>>> bring their own HttpClient version (Martin's question)?
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
>>> eclipse.org-planning-coun...@eclipse.org
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council
>>> 
>>> IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to
>>> the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you
>>> must contact e...@eclipse.org to request removal.
>> _______________________________________________
>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
>> from this list, visit
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
> _______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
> this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Reply via email to