Is Eclipse eGerrit a viable project, or is it time to terminate? Wayne
On Dec 18, 2017 9:48 AM, "Jacques Bouthillier" < jacques.bouthill...@ericsson.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > I will no longer have time to support EGerrit and the team has been > dissipated, so EGerrit will no longer participate to Eclipse Photon > > > BR, > > Jacques > ------------------------------ > *De :* cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org < > cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org> de la part de Wayne Beaton < > wayne.bea...@eclipse-foundation.org> > *Envoyé :* 15 décembre 2017 15:01:41 > *À :* Cross project issues > *Objet :* [cross-project-issues-dev] Many projects have not yet opted in > to participate in Eclipse Photon > > By way of background, we introduced the requirement that projects publicly > state their intent to participate > <https://www.eclipse.org/projects/handbook/#pmi-joining-a-simultaneous-release> > in each release to ensure that everybody is actually paying attention. In > the past, we've had to scramble to sort out last minute issues because > (some) project teams hadn't engaged. Participation in the simultaneous > release requires some ongoing investment of time and energy from those > projects that join in. > > *The deadline for stating intent to join the Eclipse Photon simultaneous > release is EOB today. *After that, the rules state that projects must > work through their PMC to have the Eclipse Planning Council grant an > exception to join after the deadline. > > I am pretty confident, however, that if you state your intent on this list > by mid-week next week, the Planning Council will accept it. Please, get > this done. > > Any project that has not declared an intent to participate will be removed > from the aggregation build prior to the *M5 release*. I'll work with Fred > and Mikael to deactivate builds early in the new year. > > AFAICT, the following projects have not stated their intention to > participate. > > - Eclipse EGerrit > - Eclipse e(fx)clipse > - Eclipse Parallel Tools Platform (PTP) > - Eclipse Sapphire > - Eclipse Sphinx > - Eclipse Target Management > - Eclipse Communication Framework > - Eclipse XWT > - Eclipse PMF > - Eclipse Orion > - Eclipse Accessibility Tools Framework > - Eclipse ATL > - *Eclipse Subversive SVN Team Provider* > - *Eclipse Data Tools Platform* > > If you represent one of these projects and have chosen not to participate, > please let the group know. > > If you're listed here in error, I apologise. Please send me a harshly > worded note pointing out my omission. > > I am working with the *Eclipse Data Tools Platform*, so we'll likely get > that resolved shortly. > > The *Eclipse Subversive* team has indicated that they can no longer > support the project, so we're going to have to sort out what (if anything) > to do about that. > > Since I'm pretty sure that the *Eclipse Packaging Project* is paying > attention (and I am a committer on the project), I've created a 4.8 > release > <https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.packaging/releases/4.8> > at +4 (consider this the project's declaration of participation). > > Thanks for your attention, > > Wayne > -- > Wayne Beaton > Director of Open Source Projects > The Eclipse Foundation > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >
_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
