On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 1:24 AM, Doug Schaefer <dschae...@blackberry.com> wrote:
> You're right, I'll leave it to the active committers to decide. And this > discussion should be happening on the tm-dev list so they see it. > If there are really no active committes to take the patches or nominate new committers and Nick/Rob still want to keep it on. The issue should be brought to Tools PMC so nomination can come up from the PMC. > > Sent from my BlackBerry - the most secure mobile device - via the Rogers > Network > *From:* mist...@redhat.com > *Sent:* January 31, 2018 5:33 PM > *To:* cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > *Reply-to:* cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > *Subject:* Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] SimRel - TM contribution has > been disabled > > > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 11:14 PM, Doug Schaefer <dschae...@blackberry.com> > wrote: > >> Does anyone want these contributions to keep RSE alive? >> > > I don't think the opinion of others should be used as a criterion here. > The thing is that if Nick, Rob or whoever have authored good patches, it's > still better to contribute them into the project, independently of what > others want to do or not with RSE. No-one is allowed to claim that a > project is dead if it still has contributors/contributions. If the patches > are proposed and seem good but don't get merged for other non-technical > reason and contributors are still interested in getting those patches > merged, then it's worth an escalation plan to turn contributors into > committers. > In general, having people authoring commits can be seen as a sign that at > least those who did the work probably have interest in authoring the > commits, ie keeping RSE alive in that case. So to me, whenever there is a > contribution, it shows that the project can still be perceived as alive and > that no other discussion is necessary before applying the typical EDP > processes to make sure project can be as successful as contributors can > make it. > To sum up, we don't need to discuss RSE state any more, the patches > authored by Rob and Nick can be a sufficient sign that RSE is still alive > and we just have to make sure the efforts stored on a GitHub branch can be > turned into activity in the origin code base if committers want it. > > Cheers, > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > -- Alexander Kurtakov Red Hat Eclipse Team
_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
