AFAIK the policy is projects should be adding such bundles to their p2 repos. That is certainly what CDT does.
However, I don't know if that is written down or really just convention. End users should not be pointing at orbit p2 repos. HTH Jonah On Sat., Jan. 25, 2020, 03:56 Ed Willink, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > I've started to action this for OCL; > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=559532 > > and hit a silly problem; who redistributes SLF4J? > > If it's standard, surely the platform should redistribute so that a copy > can be found in e.g. eclipse-SDK-4.14-win32-x86_64.zip ? > > There is no SLF4J there. There is no log4j either. Where does log4j come > form? It turns out that EGit redistributes both log4j and SLF4J. Very > helpful, but surely not right? > > What is the preferred policy for redistribution of SLF4J? Does every > project need to redistribute it itself to avoid piggy-backing on EGit or > mandating that users manually add Orbit to their Install sites? > > Regards > > Ed Willink > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > [email protected] > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >
_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list [email protected] To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
