On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 7:53 PM Wayne Beaton < wayne.bea...@eclipse-foundation.org> wrote:
> Somebody will correct me if I'm wrong, but AFAIK it a requirement for > inclusion in an EPP package is participation in the simultaneous release. > [...] > Per EPP/How to create a package > <https://wiki.eclipse.org/EPP/How_to_create_a_package>: > > Packages must only contain code from Eclipse projects from the >> Simultaneous Release > > SimRel is not a requirement for EPP any more, this was clarified with Planning Council earlier this year. The documentation needs to be updated, we'll look at it soon. > The simultaneous release participation requirements are an important part > of the quality controls around the packages. > That's arguable and you recently mentioned in another that you don't like discussions that argue about the value of SimRel ;) Independent of this, according to my records, Eclipse Corrosion is overdue > for a Release Review. Please initiate one immediately. > I'll take care of it soon. In the worst case, it's totally fine if we ship the previous 0.4.2 version of Corrosion in the upcoming SimRel. But a 0.4.3 would indeed be better.
_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
