Ondrej,

Thanks for confirming.

Jonah
~~~
Jonah Graham
Kichwa Coders
www.kichwacoders.com


On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 at 09:29, Ondrej Dockal <odoc...@redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi Jonah, Sorry for the late reply, I think everything was in the right
> shape and no more action required.
>
> Thanks for handling this issue!
>
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 9:55 PM Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Joakim and the rest of the Jetty project for the fast turnarounds
>> on your releases!
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Thanks to the Jetty project doing their release of 10.0.5 we are now
>> ready to respin what needs to change.
>>
>> @Ondrej I don't think there is anything to do for Reddeer anymore? Thank
>> you for your earlier contributions.
>>
>> Eclipse Platform / Webtools / RAP - please let me know when your pieces
>> are in so that I can build the EPP build and Fred can do the simrel release
>> prep work.
>>
>> Jonah
>>
>>
>> ~~~
>> Jonah Graham
>> Kichwa Coders
>> www.kichwacoders.com
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 at 15:29, Joakim Erdfelt <joakim.erdf...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Eclipse Jetty 10.0.5 release (*not snapshot*) is now available on maven
>>> central.
>>>
>>> - Joakim
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 5:48 AM Sravan K Lakkimsetti <
>>> sravankum...@in.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Platform testing is also complete. Verified the help feature and no
>>>> issues found.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Sravan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Markus Knauer <mkna...@eclipsesource.com>
>>>> *Sent:* 11 June 2021 15:50
>>>> *To:* Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>
>>>> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] ACTION REQUIRED
>>>> from RAP / REDDEER / WEBTOOLS - respin of Eclipse Platform RC2a and the
>>>> status on removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I finished my testing of local RAP builds based on the Jetty 10.0.5
>>>> snapshot consumed via WTP p2 repository, and with the latest platform build
>>>> from yesterday:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Everything is looking good!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> For those interested in the details: My tests were based on the Gerrit
>>>> changes #181804
>>>> <https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/rap/org.eclipse.rap/+/181804> and #181803
>>>> <https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/rap/org.eclipse.rap.tools/+/181803> and
>>>> cover the installation of the RAP Tools into the new Eclipse SDK build, and
>>>> the creation of several RAP demo projects with the new RAP Runtime. All
>>>> this worked flawlessly and only the expected bundle versions from Jetty and
>>>> SLF4J were installed. Now I am looking forward to the final Jetty build.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Markus
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 at 03:09, Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 21:07, Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The local build of simrel worked perfectly well - The expected 10.0.5
>>>> snapshot version* was there. You can see a log of the build and tree of the
>>>> output directory attached.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Because RAP only provided me a private build for the 10.0.5 snapshot
>>>> test which I used for my local tests, the local build doesn't match
>>>> https://download.eclipse.org/staging/2021-06/. The staging repo has no
>>>> slf4j (great!) but has two versions of Jetty (as expected).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have built and smoke tested (basic operation, help, checked which
>>>> versions are installed of jetty and slf4j) EPP packages locally against my
>>>> local simrel build and all looks good. I am not running the EPP build
>>>> against the public staging repo. Other than the final versions of Jetty we
>>>> can do preliminary testing on that ahead of the final build.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am *now* running the EPP build....
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So now we wait for the official 10.0.5 release of Jetty and we'll be
>>>> good to go.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jonah
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> * The Platform and WTP repackaging of 10.0.5-SNAPSHOT took different
>>>> approaches, so while they are built from the same maven coordinates, the
>>>> ones in platform are version 10.0.5.SNAPSHOT and the ones from webtools is
>>>> 10.0.5.20210610181657
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ~~~
>>>> Jonah Graham
>>>> Kichwa Coders
>>>> www.kichwacoders.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 18:50, Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I have just seen that WTP has done the simrel contribution (thanks
>>>> Nitin).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> RAP have provided me a private build.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am building everything locally now and will advise later today.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Jonah
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu., Jun. 10, 2021, 18:47 Jonah Graham, <jo...@kichwacoders.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 👍
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I was curious whether there is any changes to rerdeer needed going
>>>> forward now that it isn't republishing SLF4J alpha.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps there is nothing more needed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I assume the WTP update is coming soon. Nitin, let me know if you need
>>>> anything in this regard.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Jonah
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu., Jun. 10, 2021, 18:37 Ondrej Dockal, <odoc...@redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Jonah,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have rebuilt my release update site, though, anything except reddeer
>>>> bundles timestamps have changed, as expected. But to initiate
>>>> an aggregator validation I have prepared a gerrit commit (without actual
>>>> change to aggrcon file) [1]. I can probably wait for [2] WTP change to
>>>> rebase and rerun to make sure we are good.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1]:
>>>> https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/simrel/org.eclipse.simrel.build/+/181811
>>>>
>>>> [2]:
>>>> https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/simrel/org.eclipse.simrel.build/+/181810
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 6:50 PM Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sravan has provided me with a link to what should represent Platform's
>>>> contribution based on the jetty snapshot.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't think we need to wait for a respin of the snapshot for the
>>>> source bundle issue that Sravan identified.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If other projects (RAP / Webtools/ Reddeer) can do the same, or provide
>>>> me with build instructions I can smoke test the integration of everything
>>>> in SimRel/EPP and make sure it all looks good and try to report back to
>>>> Jetty so they can make their release.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Jonah
>>>>
>>>> ~~~
>>>> Jonah Graham
>>>> Kichwa Coders
>>>> www.kichwacoders.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 12:26, Sravan K Lakkimsetti <
>>>> sravankum...@in.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Triggered a platform build with latest 10.0.5-SNAPSHOT. But there is
>>>> issue in the source bundles as they contain temporary files
>>>> https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues/6354#issuecomment-858764165
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Sravan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com>
>>>> *Sent:* 10 June 2021 21:36
>>>> *To:* Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>
>>>> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] ACTION REQUIRED
>>>> from RAP / REDDEER / WEBTOOLS - respin of Eclipse Platform RC2a and the
>>>> status on removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The snapshot is ready
>>>> https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues/6354#issuecomment-858733158
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Jonah
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu., Jun. 10, 2021, 10:23 Jonah Graham, <jo...@kichwacoders.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We are making very good progress on resolving this issue, in no part
>>>> thanks to everyone that has been super responsive in updating their bits.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I checked all the EPP packages and (as expected) only JEE has
>>>> slf4j.api_2.0.0.alpha1.jar. All the packages (also as expected)
>>>> have org.slf4j.api_1.7.30.v20200204-2150.jar (including JEE).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The Jetty project is just about to push out a snapshot (
>>>> https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues/6390) of 10.0.5 that
>>>> fully resolves the slf4j 2.0.0 alpha1 dependency so that the SimRel and JEE
>>>> package won't have alpha1 jar anymore.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> To reduce the change of a turnaround time again we can collectively
>>>> test that the 10.0.5 snapshot resolves all the issues. Note that this a
>>>> further 10.0.5 snapshot than we had yesterday.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> RIght now, I don't know how to do this test without a full respin of
>>>> everything (platform , redeer(?) , webtools, rap).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Any suggestions are very welcome.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Jonah
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ~~~
>>>> Jonah Graham
>>>> Kichwa Coders
>>>> www.kichwacoders.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 16:56, Ondrej Dockal <odoc...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Jonah, thanks for taking care of this. If we will revert it after
>>>> RedDeer is pushed, I think it is safe to give it a try. Also, If Jetty
>>>> should be built somewhere with a fix it might provide a space for updating
>>>> all deps in all project, though, in quite late time.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 10:45 PM Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Ondre/Nitin,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/simrel/org.eclipse.simrel.build/+/181738
>>>> decouples the reddeer contribution from webtools which means if you think
>>>> it is ok you can merge that so reddeer can be merged.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Jonah
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ~~~
>>>> Jonah Graham
>>>> Kichwa Coders
>>>> www.kichwacoders.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 16:25, Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Ondrej,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> AFAICT the problem is that WTP is also pulling in org.slf4j 2.0 from
>>>> reddeer.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 15:53:01 [0]Missing requirement: Jetty :: JNDI Naming 10.0.4
>>>> (org.eclipse.jetty.jndi 10.0.4) requires 'java.package; org.slf4j
>>>> [2.0.0,3.0.0)' but it could not be found
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So because you are (correctly) removing slf4j 2.0, it is
>>>> unintentionally breaking WTP.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nitin is working on fixing up the WTP contribution. I don't think there
>>>> is actually anything wrong with reddeer's contribution, we just need a
>>>> resolution of WTP first.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I will push a patch that verifies the above in a moment.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Jonah
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ~~~
>>>> Jonah Graham
>>>> Kichwa Coders
>>>> www.kichwacoders.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 16:15, Ondrej Dockal <odoc...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately, I am still not able to pass aggregator validation, this
>>>> time it is jetty complaining about missing org.slf4j [2.0.0,3.0.0) as can
>>>> be seen in [1]. I am not really sure about what I can do about it from my
>>>> side. There is a reopened bugzilla [2] and PR on jetty project to handle
>>>> this bundle dep. range for org.slf4j, but who knows when it will be fixed.
>>>>
>>>> I am trying in a meantime to omit any bundles from my plugins in
>>>> release, not sure if that can help.
>>>>
>>>> [1]:
>>>> https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/2274/console
>>>>
>>>> [2]: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=573454
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 6:47 PM Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Ondrej,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think your analysis is correct. RAP tools publishes jetty to its p2
>>>> site, but does not include the slf4j so just happened to pick it up from
>>>> Platform until they removed it, now it picks it up from Reddeer.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Markus,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Not sure what the issues with removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha is. Do you
>>>> mean that RAP references it in too many places? If you mean too many
>>>> projects, then you might be right, but I hope not. Hopefully with rap, wtp,
>>>> and reddeer making their update we can get rid of it from the 2021-06
>>>> release entirely.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nitin,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think the RC2 contribution of WTP only validated because Reddeer is
>>>> still publishing slf4j 2.0.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jonah
>>>>
>>>> ~~~
>>>> Jonah Graham
>>>> Kichwa Coders
>>>> www.kichwacoders.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 10:55, Ondrej Dockal <odoc...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Folks,
>>>>
>>>> Gerrit aggregator validation job [1] is failing for me due to RAP
>>>> requiring jetty 10.0.3 and that transitively requires slf4j in 2.0.0 +, I
>>>> guess I have to wait for you to update jetty deps to make it work, right?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1]:
>>>> https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/2247/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 4:50 PM Markus Knauer <mkna...@eclipsesource.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Switching to Jetty 10.0.4 seems to be doable for RAP, especially
>>>> because the Webtools team was so kind to give us access to their p2
>>>> repository for building. I will try that now.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> slf4j 2.0.0 is a different issue. It was required until today, and is
>>>> now referenced in too many places. I am not sure if it will be possible to
>>>> remove it in a quick and safe manner in a last build towards RC2.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Markus
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 15:32, Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Eclipse Platform have successfully updated their contribution* (Thanks
>>>> Sravan, Thomas, Jetty team and anyone else who got this done that I don't
>>>> know about!) *to SimRel to their RC2a build and that means that
>>>> Eclipse Platform now no longer contributes the alpha 2.0.0 version.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> However other projects still are contributing the bundle to simrel
>>>> because they are republishing parts or all of Platform RC2 or earlier or
>>>> jetty 10 from other sources.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Can both *reddeer *and *rap *projects look at their contribution to
>>>> ensure that they are not contributing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha to the simrel
>>>> please.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As Platform have updated to Jetty 10.0.4, I also see that *rap* has
>>>> Jetty 10.0.3 contributed to simrel and *webtools* has 10.0.2
>>>> contributed to webtools. *All three versions* are in the simrel output
>>>> repo!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>>
>>>> Jonah
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ~~~
>>>> Jonah Graham
>>>> Kichwa Coders
>>>> www.kichwacoders.com
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Reply via email to