On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 8:17 AM Ed Merks <ed.me...@gmail.com> wrote: > Jeff, > > Given the regular release schedule of Adoptium/Temurin versions, often > fixing security-related issues, baking a particular version into each > release train repository, fixed to the particular version available at that > time, doesn't seem like the best solution to this problem. Note too that > it's highly unlikely the user was just updating 2022-06 but rather from > something much older that was previously updated to 2022-06 because 2022-06 > shipped with JustJ 17.0.x. > > Having an update site that is automatically added by EPP to each package > and points to the desired current version would seem like a better > solution. I vaguely recall having such discussions but obviously we didn't > conclude that... > > There is also a question of which version should a JustJ update site > specify? We could use this one: > > https://download.eclipse.org/justj/jres/ > > But that includes the 18.x release and soon the 19.x release. We > probably don't want people updating to those. > > We could also compose this one: > > https://download.eclipse.org/justj/jres/17/updates/release/latest > > and update to some future LTS version eventually. > > Or maybe we should just compose the above into this site which I believe > is already automatically added to all EPP packages: > > https://download.eclipse.org/releases/latest > > That would seem the simplest approach and would address the issue for > existing installations already... > +1, this looks like the best approach
> Regards, > Ed > > On 21.09.2022 23:45, Jeff Johnston wrote: > > A user recently opened an issue against JDT UI because they were trying to > update their 2022-06 Eclipse IDE for Java Developers and it fails because > the current JustJ they had: 15.0.1 is not sufficient to update components > which now require Java 17. > > While they can manually add the needed JustJ updates site would it not > make sense to make a JustJ update available automatically for such > end-users at least in the case where Eclipse increases minimum JVM > requirements? > > -- Jeff J. > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing listcross-project-issues-...@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >
_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
