On 1/25/06, Miguel Ghobangieno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Some CF programmers, such as Cave, would like to > beable to reuse their code without having to recopy > and paste what they have allready done (which would > create bloated code if it was required).
The idea of separating the code into fairly well defined areas is something I would support wholeheartedly, I don't think the current tangle of functions is a desirable thing and would much rather some functions were rearranged between files, to better reflect what they do. In this I do not disagree with Tchize and Gros, however I am still unconvinced by the case for a complex API to enforce such separation, a well constructed layout of functions within files, created according to how they are called in various places, would, I feel, help almost as much without adding yet another thing to support that will quickly become outdated. > Modules would > disallow this (bad) as they are not loaded untill they > are called. In an organisational change that would achieve the same effect, these same functions would be marked static anyway, so this is a non-point. _______________________________________________ crossfire mailing list crossfire@metalforge.org http://mailman.metalforge.org/mailman/listinfo/crossfire
