> I see two good reasons for Nicolas favouring Qt over Boost: > > - He's more familiar with Qt, and having to learn another toolkit, > especially something as complex as Boost, would be somewhat of a waste of > time;
This is true, but I'm hopefully not the only one writing the server code :) Therefore others' point of view should be taken into account. Of course, if people choose for instance COBOL for the server, I still reserve the right to work on a version that suits be better ^_- > - Although you mentioned several things that integrate nicely with Boost, > providing Internationalization or a crossplatform building system, the > whole point is that all of this is provided inside the Qt tool suite, and > requires no external/3rd party dependency. This is a significant advantage > to me. Yes, that's a point I like too, and this is also why I mentioned Qt in the first mail, because you can avoid some evil dependency-related issues (Windows is bad for that, for instance :)) Nicolas -- http://nicolas.weeger.org [Petit site d'images, de textes, de code, bref de l'aléatoire !]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ crossfire mailing list crossfire@metalforge.org http://mailman.metalforge.org/mailman/listinfo/crossfire
