I can agree that erring on the side of caution would probably be the safe thing to do in this case. This assuming you care what God thinks about what you're doing. If you don't, you've got some different problems. hehe One problem with that is can it be proved one way or another? And until it can, are you (you in a broad sense) as a married person willing to possibly risk your marriage on something that may not be necessary? As a single person it would be easier to stop until it was decided but for a couple married many years it could cause terminal problems. Either you stop having sex or end up with a bunch of kids. I suppose we could leave it in God's hands to give us the number of children He desires and maybe that's what we should do anyway, leave it in His hands.
Frankly, I had never heard of this issue until now and not really ever considered it. I'm relatively new into deep doctrine and even newer to philosophy so excuse me if my arguments aren't up to standards. It's a work in process. Personally I feel satisfied in the Onanist viewpoint but by all means if someone wants to or better yet strongly feels that they should adopt the NO view I can understand and respect that. For the huge amount of commitment, if for nothing else. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Crosspointe Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/crosspointe-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
