Just a heads up that this part might change as we are making changes in the Manifest spec and the CSP spec to add CSP support the proper way.
Sakari, you might want to sync up quickly with Anssi Kenneth On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Smith, Elliot <[email protected]> wrote: > On 9 June 2014 12:33, Poussa, Sakari <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yes, that is the intention. And if it does not work properly we need JIRA >> bugs. >> > > Thanks Sakari. Do we have a test suite for this already, or do I need to > try it out myself before I make a claim in the docs that it works? > > Elliot > > >> From: <Smith>, Elliot <[email protected]<mailto: >> [email protected]>> >> Date: Monday, June 9, 2014 at 12:49 >> To: "[email protected]<mailto: >> [email protected]>" < >> [email protected]<mailto: >> [email protected]>> >> Subject: [Crosswalk-help] content_security_policy >> >> Hello. >> >> Does the "content_security_policy" manifest field have the same >> limitations and effects as the "content_security_policy" field in a >> Chromium manifest? >> >> In particular, can the policy be relaxed in the same way? >> >> Thanks. >> Elliot >> >> -- >> Elliot Smith >> Senior Software Engineer >> Intel Open Source Technology Centre >> > > > > -- > Elliot Smith > Senior Software Engineer > Intel Open Source Technology Centre > > _______________________________________________ > Crosswalk-help mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.crosswalk-project.org/mailman/listinfo/crosswalk-help > > -- Kenneth Rohde Christiansen Web Platform Architect, Intel Corporation. Phone +45 4294 9458 ﹆﹆﹆
_______________________________________________ Crosswalk-help mailing list [email protected] https://lists.crosswalk-project.org/mailman/listinfo/crosswalk-help
