Le jeudi 30 mai 2013, à 09:30 -0500, [email protected] a écrit :
> Folks,
> 
> Just to be clear - given that the code tree is broken right now - for all 
> branches - the SledgeHammer log file change patches are being reverted.  We 
> need to get back to this asap and when we are all in the clear in respect of 
> feature freezes and code freeze snap-shots that are being created.
> 
> If this is NOT clear to anyone please bump me.

I'm fine with reverting for now, but do we have a plan to make this
possible? I don't think we should keep blocking changes in the toplevel
crowbar repo because of a lack of branching strategy for this toplevel
repo.

Vincent

> - John T.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Adam Spiers
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 9:16 AM
> To: crowbar
> Subject: Re: [Crowbar] Change in sledgehammer-common impacting more than 
> Pebbles
> 
> Victor Lowther ([email protected]) wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Vincent Untz
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 7:57 AM
> > > To: crowbar
> > > Subject: Re: [Crowbar] Change in sledgehammer-common impacting more 
> > > than Pebbles
> > > 
> > > Le jeudi 30 mai 2013, à 07:03 -0500, Victor Lowther a écrit :
> > > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:28 AM, Vincent Untz <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I just realized that one of my commits that got merged will 
> > > > > impact non-Pebbles branches, and might be an issue requiring 
> > > > > changes in these branches too. This is the following commit:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > https://github.com/crowbar/crowbar/commit/29b97580c42bdfe1e0b548cff7
> > > > > 73811eaeea16d9
> > > > >
> > > > > In short, this is changing /install-logs to 
> > > > > /var/log/crowbar/sledgehammer.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > That is going to break rather a lot of stuff.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Other branches that are using the 
> > > > > sledgehammer-common/start-up.sh file from crowbar master should 
> > > > > probably be updated with commits like these
> > > > > ones:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > https://github.com/crowbar/barclamp-provisioner/commit/0290fc89b
> > > > > 4ca8
> > > > > d446eac9c3140247f18166fd6f1
> > > > >
> > > > > https://github.com/crowbar/barclamp-logging/commit/9410dd876fc76
> > > > > 03e0
> > > > > ed9f34cefd78d7a4dcd4633
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > No -- that is all the builds in all the releases, as Sledgehammer 
> > > > is globally applicable to them all.  Your changes modifying these 
> > > > paths will have to be reverted and applied in a way that is 
> > > > Pebbles specific, preferably by modifying control.sh in the provisioner.
> > > 
> > > I'm sorry, I just don't get how we can change start-up.sh, then.
> > > Whatever we change there will always break a past release. If we 
> > > revert this change, then it means we need to keep /install-logs/ as 
> > > a NFS export, even in Pebbles.
> > >
> > > Is there a good reason all this sledgehammer stuff is not per-branch 
> > > like everything else?
> > 
> > There are reasons that seemed like a good idea at the time when we did 
> > it a year and a half ago,
> 
> So what are those reasons, and are they still considered good ideas?
> 
> > and not everything else is per-branch -- the rest of the build system 
> > and the test framework is also global.
> 
> ... which means that every time we want to touch the build system or the test 
> framework, we risk breaking them for every single release (where by "release" 
> I mean Fred, Pebbles etc.).  So the same question applies, is there a good 
> reason for that?  Because AFAICS unless it's a really really good one, it 
> doesn't outweigh the drastic disadvantages of the status quo.
> 
> If there *is* a really good reason, then the per-branch code should
> *not* live in the same repo as the globally-applicable code.
> 
> > > Or alternatively: why do we even have a lot of stuff in start-up.sh? 
> > > Why don't we move nearly all of this in control.sh, except for the 
> > > mount for the one NFS export that will make control.sh accessible?
> > 
> > Having control.sh take over from start-up.sh is in fact the direction I 
> > have been going. 
> 
> Cool :)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Crowbar mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/crowbar
> For more information: http://crowbar.github.com/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Crowbar mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/crowbar
> For more information: http://crowbar.github.com/
> 

-- 
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.

_______________________________________________
Crowbar mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/crowbar
For more information: http://crowbar.github.com/

Reply via email to