keepin' it on list...
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Judd Maltin <[email protected]> Date: Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:22 PM Subject: Re: [Crowbar] Do we want to support glance & swift without keystone? To: Vincent Untz <[email protected]> Sigh. I see what you mean about out-of-order keystone -> swift deployments. The user would have to re-deploy swift. Seems logical. Wouldn't they get to the Swift barclamp page, see that they have a keystone option, and then back out and go apply a keystone proposal? I also see what you mean about Glance and Keystone. That's a *bad thing* if the glance service isn't registered at all in keystone, as nova still needs to talk to it. That should be broken in two.. I'll have another look at the code. -judd On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Vincent Untz <[email protected]> wrote: > Le jeudi 13 juin 2013, à 11:47 -0400, Judd Maltin a écrit : >> Hi Vincent, >> >> I don't see the "Use Keystone" option you're mentioning in the Swift >> barclamp GUI. I believe it was removed a while ago. > > The UI is not there, but the backend code is still there, and keystone > will not be used if a swift proposal is created before any keystone > proposal. This is confusing for people. (Just had this happened this > week to somebody) > >> For Glance, if backing type = File, then Swift is not involved, and >> Keystone is not necessary. Not necessary, at least in how I'm >> understanding reading the recipes in the glance barclamp. > > If keystone is not used, then the glance service is not registered in > keystone. Which is probably a bad idea :-) > > Vincent > > -- > Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- Judd Maltin T: 917-882-1270 F: 501-694-7809 what could possibly go wrong? -- Judd Maltin T: 917-882-1270 F: 501-694-7809 what could possibly go wrong? _______________________________________________ Crowbar mailing list [email protected] https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/crowbar For more information: http://crowbar.github.com/
