As an ex-developer of CC.rb I might also suggest you looking at other
alternatives, especially hosted alternatives such as
CodeShips<https://www.codeship.io>.
CC.rb has not been following the state of art of Rails for a while as I
know.



On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Todd Sedano <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> In the past, I've used CruiseControl.rb, but I've noticed that the project
> really isn't being actively maintained. This email thread hasn't had a post
> in two years: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/cruisecontrolrb-users/ and
> the last time I tried to use it, I had issues with bundler integration.
>
> I'd suggest looking into Goldberg, Team City or Hudson as alternatives.
>
> My $0.02
>
> Todd
>
> Todd Sedano
> Evidence-Based Software Engineering Group
> Electrical and Computer Engineering
> Silicon Valley Campus
> Carnegie Mellon University
> Office: 650-335-2812
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Mclyn Dimaculangan <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Sir/Madam,
>>
>>
>> Our team decided to use the CruiseControl.rb to conveniently monitor
>> changes on our current projects.
>> However, we noticed that starting the CruiseControl.rb server as a daemon
>> "cruise start -d" no longer does a command return and we needed to press
>> Ctrl+c to continue.
>> Looks like all the project builders were successfully started but we are
>> wondering if something went wrong or if the behavior is just normal?
>>
>> Thank you very much.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Mclyn
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cruisecontrolrb-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/cruisecontrolrb-users
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cruisecontrolrb-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/cruisecontrolrb-users
>
>


-- 
Jeff Xiong
http://gigix.thoughtworkers.org
_______________________________________________
Cruisecontrolrb-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/cruisecontrolrb-users

Reply via email to