You've got a point there. We won't be able to do that, however, until we get down to zero warnings. Let's talk again when we get there :)
Regards, Matthias On Wednesday, 2012-08-08, Rahul Sharma wrote: > Sonar is good for reporting but I do not know if sonar can send > notifications. On the other hand a failing build provides a constant reminder > that there are some issues to fix. > Furthermore, after fixes a CI build can give feedback for new patches, we > need not to check sonar to see its impact. It would be immediately available > with a failed build. > > regards, > Rahul > ________________________________________ > From: Matthias Friedrich [[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 4:10 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Continuous Integration is up and running > > Hi, > > see below. > > On Wednesday, 2012-08-08, Rahul wrote: > [...] > > Since we now have a CI instance, can we have a build that can list > > down the quality of the project ? We have added some quality metrics > > eg checkstyle to maven site plugin, but I am not sure when would > > that be built. May be at the time of release ? But wouldn't that be > > late to do any meaningful fixes. > > I think it would be better to use Apache's Sonar instance [1] because > then we don't have to worry about where to publish the site. I wasn't > planning on doing this before release though. IIRC, Sonar and FindBugs > flag 30-40 potentially critical bugs (no blockers!) and about 30 package > dependency cycles. We won't get that done before release and Checkstyle > is a bit lower on my agenda :) > > > @Matthias : please add my address to the notification list. > > I've added you and Gabriel to the notification list. > > Regards, > Matthias > > [1] https://analysis.apache.org/
