On 04 Nov 2012, at 17:25, Matthias Friedrich <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sunday, 2012-11-04, Gabriel Reid wrote: >> On 04 Nov 2012, at 10:35, Matthias Friedrich <[email protected]> wrote: > [...] >> I noticed that CRUNCH-104 (upgrade slf4j) is included in the release >> notes -- is that what we want? Nothing actually happened for this >> ticket, and it was marked as invalid. > > Not sure what's the best thing here. At work we set the fix version to > the release for which it was considered (for whatever reason, probably > tradition). You can clear the field if you like, I don't mind either > way.
My preference is to remove it, as it feels to me that having it in there just confuses things (especially for an auto-generated list of issues that have been "resolved" in a release). Does anyone else have any objection to me clearing the version (and thereby removing CRUNCH-104 from the release notes)? - Gabriel
