On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Dieter Plaetinck <die...@plaetinck.be> wrote: > Everyone has his own set of compromises, and I don't want this to turn into a > semantic discussion about what the word "simple" means. > Just thought I should mention it, if you guys would be interested, it could > turn out beneficial to both of us. If you don't care, that's just fine for > me too ;)
It's not that we don't care, it's that CRUX is very simple and has very little architecture put into it. It is one of it's strengths and the very reason a lot of us use it. I use it for everything :) cheers James -- -- James Mills -- -- "Problems are solved by method" _______________________________________________ crux-devel mailing list crux-devel@lists.crux.nu http://lists.crux.nu/mailman/listinfo/crux-devel
