On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 03:00:15PM +0200, Michal Soltys wrote: > Ok, as promised, this is fresh approach to initscripts. > Perhaps a few rough edges here and there, but is thoroughly > tested (modulo just-a-moment ago minor changes I did)
thanks a lot, that was a expensive work ;) At a first, coarse sight I like it, but it's rather complicated compared to our current solution. A quick wc shows that we have about quad the lines, not sure whether this might be too complicated for CRUX or not. I'd really like to hear the opinions of the other core/opt maintainers here. One thing I do not understand is why you move the code to mount the fusectl filesystem to the init system. IMO this should be done at the time the kernel module is loaded. Have you seen the rule I've added in udev 174? Adding the rule to the port opt/fuse might be another option as well. Btw, shouldn't we try to add application specific stuff like the one for lvm and mdadm via the corresponding port, a kind of run-control directory with short scripts added by the packages comes to my mind? best regards Juergen P.S. unfortunately my time is still very limited at the moment, but I will try to do a first test of rc-ng next week. _______________________________________________ crux-devel mailing list crux-devel@lists.crux.nu http://lists.crux.nu/mailman/listinfo/crux-devel
