On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 09:46:18AM -0400, John Lowry wrote: > My own speculation is that the security community and its interests are > perhaps a bit broader than than some members wish it were. > > If you want to see some interesting physics that represents unexpected > results relevant to communications (and comes from entangled QKD research) > then take a look at: http://pra.aps.org/abstract/PRA/v81/i2/e023835
This is interesting. However, even if you can use LoS up to LEO, the question is of what the added value of a (supposedly, trend in QC state cloning attacks is there) tamperproof exchange is over traditional cryptography. I agree with Perry that it solves a non-problem. > There is a human-readable summary at: http://focus.aps.org/story/v25/st7 -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majord...@metzdowd.com