Arnold G. Reinhold writes: > I do not agree, however, that 1 bit per second would be fast enough. Why not? Randomness never goes stale. If it did, they wouldn't print books full of random numbers. Store the 1bps in a FIFO. Save that entropy! There's a limited amount of it in the universe, you know. :) -- -russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://crynwr.com/~nelson Crynwr supports Open Source(tm) Software| PGPok | There is good evidence 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | that freedom is the Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | cause of world peace.
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 Alex Alten
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 Ben Laurie
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 Colin Plumb
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 Eli Brandt
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 Colin Plumb
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 Adam Back
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 David Honig
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 Arnold G. Reinhold
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 Russell Nelson
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 David R. Conrad
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 Arnold G. Reinhold
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 David R. Conrad
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 Steve Bellovin
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 Colin Plumb
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 Eric Murray
- Re: Intel announcements at RSA '99 Bill Frantz