"William H. Geiger III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 06/25/99 > at 10:29 AM, "Jeffrey I. Schiller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Single DES, RC4-40, or any other weak crypto has no place in the IETF > standards. I though these kind of issues were put to rest during the > S/MIME debate. Now I see them rearing their ugly head again. If Netscape & > Microsoft are allowed to control the standard process, it will not be long > before there are no standards but their own. To the extent that these issues were "put to rest during the S/MIME debate" it was in favor of the approach used by TLS. CMS specifies how to do RC2-40, but mandates support for 3DES, exactly as TLS does. -Ekr -- [Eric Rescorla [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to protocols?... Jeffrey I. Schiller
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to proto... Anonymous
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to p... Ben Laurie
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to p... David Honig
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to proto... Lucky Green
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to p... William H. Geiger III
- DES vs RC4 -- A correction (Re: so why is IETF ... Arnold G. Reinhold
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to protocols?... Ben Laurie
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to proto... Jeffrey I. Schiller
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to p... Anonymous
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to p... Lucky Green
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES ... Ben Laurie
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES ... Russell Nelson
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to proto... William H. Geiger III
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to p... Tom Weinstein
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES ... James A. Donald
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding ... Adam Shostack
- write code outside US (Re: so why is IE... Adam Back
- Re: write code outside US (Re: so w... Tom Weinstein
- Re: write code outside US (Re: so w... Sameer Parekh